BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis
 
EXXEL Distributions
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-15-2014, 09:41 AM   #1
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

AP Racing / Essex Competition Brake Kit Review

Had this kit (6 pot/4 pot) installed for about 6 weeks now and recently got a chance to try it on the track. All I can say is WOW, what a difference! In addition to the superior stopping power, I was really interested in the 37+ lbs of unsprung weight savings (I weighed the kit components myself and can confirm the weight savings, actually my scale was showing a little more savings than claimed), which rivals/surpasses much more expensive CCB options. I also installed lightweight forged ATS Superlight 19 inch wheels and between the wheels and brakes, unsprung weight has been reduced by ~60 lbs or ~15 lbs per corner (wheels about 6 lbs lighter than ZCP in same sizes.)

This is a no-nonsense racing brake kit that does have slightly smaller discs -5mm front, -10mm rear, which when coupled with the lightweight calipers (OEM ones weigh a TON..its crazy), helps achieve the big weight savings. Let me say that even though I'm running the same tires/sizes as the ZCP, I would say that 75-80% of the cars tendency to understeer has been reduced. And the of course stopping power is incredible!

Here's the link, very educational in its own right:

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=921567

On the street: I run the Ferodo ds2500 pads, which are a street but occasional track compound. Zero squealing noise. Only slight high pitched squeak when I start my car and roll down the driveway, but goes away as soon as you start driving and everything heats up (normal for bbks). On very rough roads (we're talking SF construction roads) there was some slight rattle on the front pads, which isn't really noticeable with the windows down, more when they are up.. Ferodo pads are known for running a little small, so you may have a different experience with running a larger pad. It's all cost benefit as smaller pads let more air in for cooling, so best to consult with an expert for your application. Otherwise the brakes themselves basically have very little additional noise..a little bit (light single thud) when you tap suddenly as car slows to a stop, or go in reverse then stop, but nothing that is bothersome (6SP MT generates so much more noise, just as a comparison point).

On the track: WOW! Last time I tracked was with stock brakes with fluid swap, and brakes did exhibit some fade, uneven braking and the tires got very hot and sticky. Not this time around! Was able to brake significantly later, there was zero fade, modulation was very linear, and my stock PSSs did not feel squishy at all and held up surprisingly well (wanted to try out AD08s for my next set, but now not so sure). Was tracking in 25-30 minute sessions and brakes didn't skip a beat and this is on Laguna Seca, which is very hard on the brakes and tires given a car of this weight (some in M4 post believe the track is harder on brakes vs the Nurburgring, which I really don't buy lol). Nothing scientific, but I do think that the brakes were generating less heat than stock, despite slightly smaller discs as there was no tire squishiness and they didn't seem as sticky right after my runs. The Ferodo ds2500 is more than capable to handle a track like Laguna Seca, at least at my skill level. There were also a few comparable vehicles there (M3s, one M5 and some Porsches) and definitely felt I was able to get deeper in the braking zone than they were.

On the track and on spirited drives in the twistys, the brake/wheel combination feels like the car lost 300 lbs. Understeer is reduced by 75-80% (my tire and wheel sizes are stock and have stock ZCP suspension). I can really see the benefits of reducing unsprung weight and rotational mass. The car actually drives smoother even over bumpy roads and grip feels substantially improved, and in transitions, the car is extremely responsive & feels more toss able, which is very confidence inspiring. ZCP modes in normal and sport don't feel as jarring as before.

Biggest worry: Was a little reticent to go smaller discs due my having 19 inch wheels, but due to the caliper being larger than stock, I don't feel it detracts from the overall looks at all, as I personally prefer an understated, purposeful racing look (though my parking garage guys noticed the change right away!) and looks way better than stock. Now that i have them on, I LOVE the J-hook design, two piece hat, anodized caliper finish, matches my wheels and car color perfectly (IMO).

Installation: Didn't do it myself but took it to a local shop and they said it was very easy. Everything was packed very nicely, with one brake rotor + caliper in each box, all very well labeled and instructions were extremely detailed, but not confusing at all. As a more japanese performance/racing focused shop, my installer was very impressed with the kit, completeness, quality of components, and instructions and thought it was a great value for what you got in a one-stop shop package. Pad swaps are very easy as you don't have to take the caliper off. I did decide to retain the dust shields (Cantrell ducts in front I installed these at the same time, stock in back) and the stock ones in rear had to be sawed a little (probably the front ones too if you decide to keep those).

Essex also conveniently pre-bedded the rotors with the Ferodo compound on their bedding machine, so literally it was put the brakes on and go to the track! Don't know of any other shop that performs this service and is super convenient.

Customer service: Jeff Ritter and the guys at Essex are top notch, answering all my questions and providing a ton of detail. Its very obvious these guys know brakes and Essex is well known across the US as the go-to place for brake builds/design across numerous racing and high performance applications. Shipping/processing is what you would expect from top notch shops on here (e.g. IND, EAS).

Other: On the fluid, I went with Castrol SRF and the shop did need to bleed the brakes a couple of times in order to achieve a precise, linear feel with great feedback. Highly recommend this fluid as well.

I also installed the Cantrell Motorsport Brake Duct kit ($500), though I'm probably not getting the full benefit of cooling as the CF splitters I have cover about 1/2 the hole, so I opened up the bottom of the splitters to get a little more air in there. Let me say those are a PITA to install..in retrospect, after the sublime BBK performance on the track, I think the cooling ducts are probably overkill and wouldn't do it over again.

Pros: Excellent stopping power, feel/modulation, and balance, unsrpung weight reduction you can feel in terms of handling/grip, ease of install/pad swap, clear instructions, extremely purposeful design, top notch customer service, pre-bedding of rotors, great option for 18 inch wheel clearance (not relevant for me, but nice for some), think price reasonable for what you get considering its all easily put together for you (a time saver in it own right)

Cons: Slighly more noise (more brake pad rattle depending on pad), if want to keep dust shields they have to be trimmed (think is the case for every BBK) Ferodo pads are actually dustier than I expected, despite fact I used street compound, smaller caliper and rotor sizes and no color options for calipers (not a con for me personally). Next time I'll probably choose a street/trackable pad that is slightly larger to reduce rattle on rough roads. You also lose the brake wear indicators (which need to be tied to the suspension to not throw a brake warning light on)

IMO on a broader note, if you are looking for your first mod to reduce unsprung weight and rotating mass, all things being equal, would go with the wheels first, you can definitely feel that more vs the brakes, but make no mistake once the new brakes were on, the nimbleness was taken even further to another level. If you want to improve your track time, would say go with the brakes first as that stopping power (even with street pads) becomes very noticeable at corner entry.

Extremely satisfied and highly recommend this BBK for track junkie as well as those like me who DD their car and see 3-4 track days a year.

See below for pics of unboxing, what they look like relative to 19" rims stance wise and of course, what they look like in their natural habitat
Attached Images
         

Last edited by FogCityM3; 06-18-2014 at 10:57 PM.. Reason: link
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 03:21 PM   #2
Harry Da Hamster
Captain
Harry Da Hamster's Avatar
86
Rep
623
Posts

Drives: The Bus
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: HNL

iTrader: (5)

The title is misleading. It should read "AP Racing/Essex Lightweight Small Brake Kit Review"

The other thread (that you quoted) has a lot of information but i am still skeptical. The E9x M3 OEM rotors are quite big for a factory system. But if its not very necessary to upgrade in size, why not just a caliper upgrade? Is there a weight advantage in the rotors? I would suspect a significant amount of leverage has been lost compared to an upgrade of factory sizing.

Just thinking out loud...
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 03:35 PM   #3
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Duly noted. Essex calls it competition kit, used bbk just by habit; title changed
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 03:55 PM   #4
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

All weight savings of components detailed on referenced thread and essex website. Nearly 5 lbs savings on EACH rotor front and 6 lbs rear due to 2 piece hat design and size. For cooling, more vanes on rotors, more airflow around calipers and pads

Last edited by FogCityM3; 06-15-2014 at 04:39 PM..
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 05:39 PM   #5
FormulaMMM
Brigadier General
FormulaMMM's Avatar
United_States
3663
Rep
3,422
Posts

Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest

iTrader: (2)

Sweet kit and nice review. Serious weight savings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FNG View Post
The title is misleading. It should read "AP Racing/Essex Lightweight Small Brake Kit Review"

The other thread (that you quoted) has a lot of information but i am still skeptical. The E9x M3 OEM rotors are quite big for a factory system. But if its not very necessary to upgrade in size, why not just a caliper upgrade? Is there a weight advantage in the rotors? I would suspect a significant amount of leverage has been lost compared to an upgrade of factory sizing.

Just thinking out loud...
Skeptical of a 6 piston/4 piston AP Racing kit being superior to OE??

This is a massive caliper upgrade. It's also a rotor quality upgrade. There is no component of these brakes that isn't in another league from OE.
__________________
M4 GTS, GT3, C63 S | E90 M3s, E39 M5

Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 07:47 PM   #6
GTB/ZR-1
Lieutenant
GTB/ZR-1's Avatar
21
Rep
542
Posts

Drives: Pending...
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Central, FL

iTrader: (17)

Great review! That unsprung/rotational weight savings is fantastic.

I had an AP/Essex kit on my past FR-S & although they were great on the track, ZERO fade & rock-solid pedal @ all times; they were a bit loud while driving down the road.

Do you notice a whirring noise w/ the slotted rotors? It was distracting to me & I had to make sure the windows were up & radio on while street driving lol
__________________
* '11 E71 X6 M MCB
* '16 Z51 M7 C7 Corvette--SCCA Solo/DE Weapon
* '90 Corvette ZR-1 (Fast)
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 08:59 PM   #7
Kunman
First Lieutenant
26
Rep
328
Posts

Drives: m3
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

awsom! thanks for the review op

Quote:
Originally Posted by FNG View Post
The title is misleading. It should read "AP Racing/Essex Lightweight Small Brake Kit Review"

The other thread (that you quoted) has a lot of information but i am still skeptical. The E9x M3 OEM rotors are quite big for a factory system. But if its not very necessary to upgrade in size, why not just a caliper upgrade? Is there a weight advantage in the rotors? I would suspect a significant amount of leverage has been lost compared to an upgrade of factory sizing.

Just thinking out loud...
i dont think there are any caliper upgrades for the m3 yet...atleast i couldn't find any
Appreciate 0
      06-15-2014, 09:35 PM   #8
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

Yeah that's what I was warned about with slottled/j-hook rotors (was also on some of Essex's post and characterized as feint for the M3), but I don't notice any whirring noises. The M3 is already a pretty road noisy car (and with an MT, always getting prominent rattling from the flywheel/gear console) so maybe it's drowned out by these things and/or engine noise. What was immediately noticeable to me however, was pad rattle on rough roads (mostly when windows are up no less) and a little less noticeable are "thuds" at lower speeds, especially when stopping in reverse. Also as mentioned when backing out of my moderately inclined driveway with cold brakes, there is a high pitched (but not loud) squeal noticeable only with windows down as there is slight pad rub on rotors (whether or not brake pedal is depressed). Once you start driving and brakes warm up, it disappears.

All the sounds I described above are very temperature dependent. Pad rattle is non-existent when brakes are cold or very hot..more prominent after you've been driving normally for 15 minutes and hit rough roads/bumps. Slight squeal on cold temp only and thudding at low speeds seems to happen more when cold/slightly warmed up. I also live in a moderate climate area with not that much variation..so far my driving hasn't broken below 40 degrees or above 80, so hard to say if things better or worse in much hotter/cooler conditions.

Make no mistake, this kit is not as quiet as stock, but for me the compromise of a little more noise was minor.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTB/ZR-1 View Post
Great review! That unsprung/rotational weight savings is fantastic.

I had an AP/Essex kit on my past FR-S & although they were great on the track, ZERO fade & rock-solid pedal @ all times; they were a bit loud while driving down the road.

Do you notice a whirring noise w/ the slotted rotors? It was distracting to me & I had to make sure the windows were up & radio on while street driving lol
Appreciate 0
      06-16-2014, 08:17 AM   #9
JEllis
Major General
JEllis's Avatar
535
Rep
5,498
Posts

Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth

iTrader: (4)

Awesome review!
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
Instagram: jellismotorwerks
Appreciate 0
      06-17-2014, 12:49 AM   #10
dj_dub
IG: @dj_dub
dj_dub's Avatar
1808
Rep
1,452
Posts

Drives: 2010 BMW E90 M3 - SG/FR 6MT
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: SF Bay Area to Las Vegas

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
Thanks for the review and great looking car man! …from another SG E90 M3 owner.
__________________
CarboProject CF Plenum | Dinan CF Intake | ESS Tune | RKP X-Pipe | Akra w/CF Tips | MFactory CF DS | CSF Cooling | AST 5200 | Hotchkis F/R Sways | SPL/Ground Control/Fall-Line Arms | DEFIV Diff Brace | StudioRSR Rollcage | 3-piece BBS RT88 | Michelin PS4S | Brembos F/R | Recaro Profi SPG XL | CAE Ultra Shifter | Perf Elec Wheel V2 | BAVSOUND | GT4 CF Front Lip/Canards/Rear Wing | Arkym CF Rear Diffuser | Forcewerkz CF SS | Varis CF Lower Tray | Turner Skidplate | BayOptiks Headlights
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 04:21 AM   #11
gnoy26
Private First Class
15
Rep
146
Posts

Drives: M3 E92
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia

iTrader: (4)

looks good
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 07:30 PM   #12
Kunman
First Lieutenant
26
Rep
328
Posts

Drives: m3
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Canada

iTrader: (0)

300lbs is about right, right? Unsprung weight x 6 = conventional weight saving

Op does the caliper have a bleeding nipple on the front lol? And is the pad change easy? I want to go BBK just for the ease of brake bleed and pad swap.

Last edited by Kunman; 06-22-2014 at 07:39 PM..
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 07:50 PM   #13
Brian0473
Lieutenant
Brian0473's Avatar
31
Rep
459
Posts

Drives: 2010 SSII DCT Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX

iTrader: (8)

Thanks for taking the time to write such a great review. Seems like a very purposeful and effective kit. I would take this every time over some of the gaudy 8-pot setups I've seen that would probably melt on the track.
__________________
No toys right now...

My old M3:
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 07:50 PM   #14
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

All calipers have the bleeding screw in the front and pad swaps are very easy, can be done without caliper removal. thx

Edit: The bleeding screw is black and is partially hidden by the wheel spokes, so kind of hard to see (you can see it on the unboxing picture of the caliper in the top left corner), but yes it is at the top of the highest "pot" on the front part of each caliper if that makes any sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kunman View Post
300lbs is about right, right? Unsprung weight x 6 = conventional weight saving

Op does the caliper have a bleeding nipple on the front lol? And is the pad change easy? I want to go BBK just for the ease of brake bleed and pad swap.

Last edited by FogCityM3; 06-22-2014 at 08:56 PM..
Appreciate 0
      06-22-2014, 08:04 PM   #15
mkPOTO
Mr. Nice Says Hello
mkPOTO's Avatar
638
Rep
16,662
Posts

Drives: BMW M3 | X5 xdrive 35i MSport
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA

iTrader: (25)

Garage List
those brakes look AMAZING!
Appreciate 0
      06-24-2014, 01:34 PM   #16
gnoy26
Private First Class
15
Rep
146
Posts

Drives: M3 E92
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia

iTrader: (4)

very pretty piece cant go wrong with APs
Appreciate 0
      06-24-2014, 04:22 PM   #17
RickyBobby
Captain
RickyBobby's Avatar
108
Rep
697
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NorCal

iTrader: (3)

How bad was the knockback from T8-T10?
Appreciate 0
      06-24-2014, 08:49 PM   #18
FogCityM3
Colonel
FogCityM3's Avatar
500
Rep
2,400
Posts

Drives: M3 (E90) & Porsche GT3 RS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (0)

I don't think I experienced it. The brakes have anti-knockback springs and I think the rotor sizes may have helped (smaller than a lot of BBKs, which may help reduce knock back). On one lap on turn 8, I felt a slight ABS "ice effect" where took a little more pedal travel and heard this very short "rat-tat-tat-tat" burst of sound but I had full stopping power available for the turn and at every subsequent turn right after that, the brakes didn't miss a beat. Was pretty sure was ABS kicking in as I had developed a ton of speed and braked pretty late into turn 8.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RickyBobby View Post
How bad was the knockback from T8-T10?
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST