11-28-2013, 10:31 AM | #1 | |
Major General
1715
Rep 5,110
Posts |
Auto Motor und Sport compares the M5 vs RS7 vs E63 AMG S
In this test the M5 CP comes last due to it's traction problems and the notchy gearbox(!!??)
RS7 wins and E63 second. http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/v...g-7897472.html There have been several reviews lately where the lack of AWD on the M5 has been a negative issue for the reviewers. Suspect we will see an AWD M5 in next generation... The results of the test is here: http://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/v...72.html?show=2 Google translate of the text: Quote:
|
|
11-28-2013, 10:38 AM | #2 |
Major General
2873
Rep 7,885
Posts |
Very interesting. I found this video by good ole' Gustav more enlightening.
I like how they say the M6 Gran Coupe is more the track car and the RS7 is more the highway bruiser. And the comparison with the old Porsches made so much sense!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 11:08 AM | #3 |
Major General
1715
Rep 5,110
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 03:46 PM | #5 | |
Captain
67
Rep 704
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 03:56 PM | #6 |
Major General
1715
Rep 5,110
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 04:08 PM | #7 |
Colonel
4065
Rep 2,064
Posts |
OMG google translate sucks ass.
It beats me why AMS didn't bring an RS6 to this comparo?
__________________
2004 e87 118d (ret.), 2007 e92 330d (ret.), 2007 e87 130i M-sport (ret.), 2009 e92 M3 (ret.), 2010 f10 535d M-sport (ret.), 2015 f10 M5 CP (ret.), 2017 f82 M4 CP (ret.)
2022 g26 i4 M50 & 2009 e70 X5 35d |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 05:55 PM | #8 |
Knight Commander
559
Rep 5,948
Posts
Drives: 2014 911 Turbo S
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Buckhead
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2014 Porsche 911 Tu ... [10.00]
2015 Mercedes-Benz ... [0.00] 2015 Jaguar F Type R [0.00] 2014 BMW M5 [0.00] |
I suspect the issue with the M5 CP is that the revised MDM programming with the CP allows more slip for more manual control. However since it is difficult to control as is, you're better off with the standard programming.
__________________
2022 Mercedes-Benz EQS 580
2020 Mercedes-Benz GLE 450 Ordered: EQS580, BMW IX, Lucid Air Touring, Corvette Stingray |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 09:25 PM | #10 |
Captain
168
Rep 773
Posts |
it is interesting, i just got my M5 Comp Pack a few weeks ago. As the weather here in DC has gotten colder, I've found myself missing 4WD just a little. In the mornings you have to be pretty careful leaving a stoplight, i almost always get rear wheel spin and the traction control comes on.
in the wet, with all these wet leaves around...it gets a little more precarious But once the tires are warmed up then life is coudn't be better. Unfortunately my commute is 3 miles long and they never warm up Jeff |
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 09:47 PM | #11 | |
Lieutenant
19
Rep 505
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-28-2013, 09:56 PM | #12 |
Captain
168
Rep 773
Posts |
I am. I know that's part of the reason why. But I had an X5M which has summers all year round. The 4wd does make a big difference for non-track cars. But I'm a bimmer guy...I hate my wife's mercedes, I don't think I would have as much fun in an audi, and the panamera is butt ugly.
Ha! Jeff |
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2013, 04:25 AM | #13 |
Lieutenant Colonel
141
Rep 1,837
Posts |
BMW M5 Competition 490 points
Fiery engine rear-wheel drive plus a lot of fun during drought. However, the BMW M5 gets its power barely on the road and sucks with transmission jerking. is it a joke? |
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2013, 05:01 AM | #14 | |
Live for today tomorrow never comes
1989
Rep 9,498
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Live for now, life is too short.
2021 LCI M5 Marina Bay Blue/ Smoked White Leather |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-29-2013, 03:40 PM | #15 | |
Private First Class
16
Rep 128
Posts |
Quote:
That' s really enough for me. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2013, 06:47 AM | #16 |
Captain
194
Rep 850
Posts |
For fun reading
"There aren't many 550bhp cars you can treat like a Corsican hire car, but the RS7 feels virtually idiot proof. Jam the brakes mid-corner, barrel into a hairpin 50mph quicker than you meant to, whatever: the big Audi smothers all your stupidity under a great blanket of electronic cleverness and relentless grip. It's a freakishly effective machine for getting down just about any road at near-unimaginable pace, instantly transforming you into a far better driver than you truly are. There is a trade-off. Like the RS6 - like every hot Audi - the RS7 isn't the last word in feelsome handling. In fact, it's barely in the second half of the dictionary. The steering's hazy, and trying to ascertain what's going on with the tyres is like playing the piano in oven gloves. Ride quality on the steel-spring suspension offered as part of the Dynamic Ride Control package is disturbing on a deeply psychological level: better to stick with the standard air suspension and save your cash for the optional carbon-ceramic brakes, which do a reassuringly pitiless job of hauling the RS7's near-two-tonne bulk to a halt. However you spec it, the RS7 remains less responsive and interactive than that pesky rear-wheel-drive BMW M6 GC (which, admittedly, starts some £14,000 above the Audi) or the thunderous, similarly slidey Mercedes-Benz CLS63 AMG. But if you're happy to trade in drama and involvement for devastating, accessible pace and a dose of flattery, the Audi is king." http://www.topgear.com/uk/audi/a7-sp...est/rs7-driven |
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2013, 02:43 PM | #17 |
Major General
1715
Rep 5,110
Posts |
EVO Magazine did a comparison test between the RS7 and the M6 GC.
The M6 beats the RS7 by a large margin. It's not online unfortunately, and has to much text for me to write it here. But the M6 gets praise for it's handling, steering and being a car that's fun to drive. The RS7 looses out on the usual Audi issues such as torque steer, suspension settings and not very fun to drive... |
Appreciate
0
|
11-30-2013, 03:02 PM | #18 |
Major General
763
Rep 5,560
Posts |
I read auto motor und/ and sport for more than ten years and this is for sure one of their arranged tests: when a VW group car must win it even normally it's the worst
Who is interested only by 0-100 km/h numbers? Why not 100 - 200 km/h numbers? 0-200 km/h is almost the same for all the three cars, but going faster than this BMW will be on top. No track times? What a joke Interior quality, options available, tech? I'm still waiting the online test from Sport Auto with M6 GC, CLS AMG, RS7 and the Panny |
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2013, 11:19 AM | #19 |
Major
110
Rep 1,291
Posts |
Audi must be confused since they created the RS7 to take on CLS63AMG and M6CG, isn't it? Even knowing the RS6 isn't available in North America, I still can't understand seeing/reading so many RS7 vs E63 vs M5 comparison articles.
__________________
Must stop eating..............
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|