|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
335i N54 PPK vs Tesla Model S 85
|
|
06-18-2013, 03:43 PM | #1 |
Lieutenant
156
Rep 533
Posts |
335i N54 PPK vs Tesla Model S 85
Hello,
Had to comment on this run in with a Tesla Model S merging onto the highway. I was behind the Tesla Model S about a car and I floor it trying to pass from 30 mph and he floors it and we are dead even until about 70 mph where he starts pulling. My car only has PPK. No noise, no drama, the guys cars just starts moving haha. I want one baaaad. |
06-18-2013, 03:50 PM | #3 |
Major General
81
Rep 6,092
Posts |
torque > horsepower
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2013, 03:59 PM | #5 |
Lieutenant Colonel
91
Rep 1,555
Posts |
Let me just leave this here:
http://www.automobilemag.com/am/01/2...eos/18001.html Of course I think the driver racing the m5 drives like my grandmother, but the fact that they are even comparing it to the m5 gives you something to think about.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2013, 04:44 PM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
26
Rep 336
Posts |
There is something wrong with that video, the Tesla Model S performance does 0-60 in 5 seconds according to Motor Trend. The F10 M5 also according to Motor Trend does 0-60 in 3.7 seconds. No way the Model S can take an M5.
At least on paper, the Model S and a stock 335i look like they would be about the same in terms of acceleration and quarter mile. |
Appreciate
0
|
06-18-2013, 04:56 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant Colonel
69
Rep 1,766
Posts |
Dat instant torque.
I want one too as soon as they finally fix all those pesky electronic issues.
__________________
JBD @ 100% | KW ST Coilovers | M3 rep. front bumper | 888Concepts AE Upgrade | GP Thunder 7500k fogs | Cyba 4" carbon tips | BSW Stage 1 | APEX ARC-8 W/ Michelin PSS | Ziza LED interior | Weisslicht LED side lenses | Sprint Booster | Euro side mirrors | M-Sport semi-conversion | Coded | LOTS of carbon fiber
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-19-2013, 12:37 AM | #11 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
111
Rep 1,951
Posts |
Quote:
for two, torque isn't (ever) the ONLY thing that matters. In an EV it's A) more important, because there's often no transmission besides that (or rather a fixed transmission without multiple speeds), but also B) more available, since electric motors have a flatter torque curve (thus, a more linear power curve). For three, the real point is that as far as power management goes, you basically can't beat electric. It's simpler, easier, and better. No turbos to spool up, no lag between control and output, basically none of the things that make gas engines hard to design really, really well. Electric is basically cheating, and the performance of the model S shows that. The hard, annoying part is energy storage.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2013, 01:58 PM | #13 | |
Colonel
453
Rep 2,973
Posts |
Quote:
Your tone is condescending. If you want to be accurate: Maximum torque for an electric motor is a 0 RPM. Maximum power at 50% maximum RPM. Maximum efficiency at 75-90% of maximum RPM. On the typical gas engine as load increases and RPM falls so does torque. On the typical electric motor an increase in load and decrease in RPM increases torque. Electric motrors do exhibit a dip in torque but like most electric motors for cars, even model cars have high start torque. The torque then rises again until you get to break down torque. The torque available to acceleration is : Accel Torque = Available Motor Torque - Load Torque. The load being aerodyanamic friction, mass and rolling friction. I don't see how electric is cheating anymore than a turbo is. F1 cars use KERS; Kinetic Energy Recovery System to boost peak HP for short period of time. The BMW 335i Hybrid uses a transmission/elctric motor combination for power delivery. Anyway, I don't need an education. Thank you. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-25-2013, 03:19 PM | #14 | |
Bavarian Murder Weapon
4
Rep 249
Posts
Drives: E90 335i 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Las Vegas, NV
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2013, 01:11 PM | #15 |
Captain
269
Rep 607
Posts |
I don't normally street race but I had a Model S tail me recently from a stop light. I accelerated up to 60 miles per hour with the Tesla right behind me, but I was able to slowly crawl away.
I have JB4 stage 2 on map 5, 91 octane. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2013, 01:18 PM | #16 | |
Banned
30
Rep 575
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2013, 01:22 PM | #17 |
Lieutenant
39
Rep 585
Posts
Drives: 2010 335i
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tampa
|
similar story, wasnt racing but was hauling @ss early like 5am at like 90mph and the a Telsa.. not sure what kind.. but he gunned it after he saw me coming and i walked right past him after 120+ prob needed a charge.. but still impressive
__________________
2010 335i Coupe / 6MT / MHD | FBO+ MMP S3 /AUBURN WDE / PATRIOTS / CELTICS / REDSOX
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2013, 01:22 PM | #18 |
Captain
269
Rep 607
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2013, 01:25 PM | #19 |
Captain
269
Rep 607
Posts |
From what I understand they are not that fast from a roll but have great torque. I think you must have been running against one of their faster models with 400+ tq.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-03-2013, 01:32 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant Colonel
111
Rep 1,951
Posts |
Every S on the road now is the performance model, since they have production full up with it (why produce cheaper cars if demand exceeds capacity for more expensive ones?) I'm not certain about that, it could just be that they're only producing the 85kWh pack models, but anyway if that's as true as I think it is that's the performance discrepancy: the ~5s 0-60 number is the base model, which doesn't exist in the wild yet.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-06-2013, 12:36 PM | #22 |
Lieutenant
156
Rep 533
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|