|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Speeding Ticket
|
|
03-29-2010, 01:20 PM | #1 |
Enlisted Member
6
Rep 40
Posts |
Speeding Ticket
Just a curious questions...I recieved a speeding ticket on 407 for 29.5 over...
Here's the funny thing....the vehicle on the ticket say Blue Mazda Protege 5...I drive a Black BMW 328i Coupe...completely different...any one experience this before? Any chance I can win from this mistake? |
03-29-2010, 01:27 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant Colonel
109
Rep 1,801
Posts |
Definitely opt to fight/challenge the speeding ticket in court, when your court day arrives just talk to the prosecutor and tell him the deal. Did the cop atleast get your license plate right? That might a determining factor whether he'll throw it out of court or not. Still, there's a big difference between a blue Mazda Protege5 and a black BMW 328i coupe. lol
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2010, 03:31 PM | #4 |
Dreamer
34
Rep 837
Posts |
Hey...I've gotten almost every ticket in the book...except for the license plate, a stop sign,and stunt driving....I would talk to a paralegal but I doubt your claim as a mistake would hold in court. However it doesnt hurt to try...
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2010, 03:49 PM | #5 |
Private First Class
1
Rep 143
Posts |
Maybe, but did he read the ticket before he gave it to you? Was he paying attention to what he was doing? Was he being careful in the execution of his duties? Maybe he was distracted or having a bad day. Who knows what kind of other mistakes he might have made, such as taking an incorrect speed reading.
It would be foolish to base your entire case around this one fact -- you should defend yourself as vigorously and thoroughly as possible using all of the evidence available and use every legitimate defence you have -- but it certainly raises questions about how closely the police officer was paying attention to what he was doing; perhaps enough to raise reasonable doubt as to your guilt. Then again, maybe it won't be enough. From the sounds of it, traffic courts generally don't take all that seriously your right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, so the deck is stacked pretty heavily against you right from the get go. But if you are going to defend yourself, you might as well do it properly and try to get the ticket quashed due to errors and, if that doesn't work, present the error as evidence that the officer was not paying close attention to the particulars of the situation, thus casting into doubt his entire recollection of the event. Assuming that you didn't make any incriminating statements during the traffic stop (like admitting you were speeding just a little, maybe) and there is no other corroborating evidence, you could then argue that the evidence shows that the officer's eyewitness account is the only evidence they have, and that there is room for reasonable doubt as to the accuracy of that testimony. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2010, 06:38 AM | #6 |
Major General
385
Rep 7,952
Posts |
yes, challenge the fact that he didnt verify the facts the day of the incident. ask him if he remembers what type of car you drove that day, weather conditions, time, temperature, etc. they are supposed to not this all down. if it starts getting sketchy, you can then draw doubt on the actual speed reading, and then tie in the incorrect vehicle description. you can post questions to the officer as well when you are there. just be polite when doing so. if anything, it will be reduced.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2010, 08:22 AM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
14
Rep 313
Posts |
how about asking for an interpreter, if the interpreter doesn't show up, case gets thrown out. Thats what I'm doing with my speeding ticket, not sure if it would work though.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2010, 10:41 AM | #8 | |
Lieutenant
21
Rep 495
Posts |
Quote:
Anyway, invest some of your time to learn the system. Read the entire site: www.ticketcombat.com
__________________
"WINDING ROAD FOR 7 KM" ... l |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2010, 01:26 PM | #9 | |
Enlisted Member
6
Rep 40
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2010, 04:43 PM | #11 |
Private First Class
1
Rep 143
Posts |
I am not a lawyer, but common sense suggests that the first rule of not getting convicted is: do not admit to committing the act that forms the substance of the charge. Your own confession is probably the hardest piece of evidence to defend against (notwithstanding the fact that false confessions are extremely easy to obtain in many cases).
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2010, 09:22 PM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
153
Rep 3,868
Posts
Drives: E93 335i
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: GTA
|
Quote:
__________________
12.770 @ 112.81 mph||slip||JB4|FMIC|DPs|DCI|N54 DVs|ER CP|Koni FSD|Eibach-Pro|F Strut-bar|R Sway-bar|Hankooks V12|DPE SP16|BBK|15%Tint|CF Front Lip|CF Diffuser|M3 Spoiler|SmartTop|LUX AE|Debadged |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|