|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
e90 335 vs m45 sport..let's hear it
|
|
10-22-2006, 01:05 AM | #1 |
Second Lieutenant
59
Rep 237
Posts
Drives: F90 M5, prior F80 M3, E60 M5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bay Area, Northern CA
|
e90 335 vs m45 sport..let's hear it
Alright...I have been wondering who the new e90 335 can take on...
I figure it will out do the is350 and new g35 so what about the next level? M45/MB e500/545 ( I figure it cant compete with the new MB 550 or BME 550) Any thoughts :rocks: are welcome... |
10-22-2006, 01:15 AM | #2 |
Major
81
Rep 1,055
Posts |
it will take on an e500 without a problem... its the same bhp, and 400kg less..
The e550 will out gun it , the BMW 550i should be kinda equal, maybe the 335i would lose at high speeds 100mph+
__________________
2007 CLS55 AMG / 2003 BMW 745Li
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 01:36 AM | #3 | |
Colonel
150
Rep 2,419
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
It's a great time to be alive
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 01:40 AM | #4 | |
Major
81
Rep 1,055
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2007 CLS55 AMG / 2003 BMW 745Li
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 01:49 AM | #5 | |
Colonel
150
Rep 2,419
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
It's a great time to be alive
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 01:52 AM | #6 | |
Major
81
Rep 1,055
Posts |
Quote:
plus Autocar (in the UK) tested the E550 at 5.1s from 0-62.5mph
__________________
2007 CLS55 AMG / 2003 BMW 745Li
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 07:38 AM | #7 |
Captain
166
Rep 690
Posts |
Car and Driver did a comparo with the E550,550i and M45 I think dont recall...but for this purpose3 I am pretty sure they got 0-60MPH on the E550 in 4.8 sec. that is exectly what the E90 335i did in another car and driver test....so 0-60 should be neck and neck....but wait get the Vishnu stage 1 package and for under $3k(Aprox.) you will take the V8 competetors without any issues
__________________
For Sale:
Brand New Alpine White Rear Bumper E90 4dr 325/328/330 $399 |
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 08:03 AM | #9 |
Brigadier General
213
Rep 3,835
Posts
Drives: Jerez E90 M3
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Westchester, NY / Fort Lauderdale, FL
|
The new M3 could be dangerous!
__________________
11' E90 M3 6MT | Jerez Black | Black Ext./Carbon | ZCP | ZCW | ZPP | ZTP | 302 | 403 | 507 | 5AC | 655 | 6FL | 752 |
15' F80 M3 6MT | Black Saphire | Black Full | ZEC | ZLP | 2VF | 2VZ | 5DL | 688 | |
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 10:11 AM | #10 |
Expert Road Racer
59
Rep 1,329
Posts |
I own an M45 Sport and I am willing to race but will lose to any well driven 335i, of that I have no doubt. Which is why I'm now back here deciding if and when to order my 335i (LSD? Dinan chip? Perhaps convertible? Price and seating of GT-R?)
I think it would be a drivers race versus the 550 and E550, equal drivers or repeated runs I still think the 335i wins (E550 would be the closest in a straight line, none would keep up on a road race course) Now, if someone would offer a Supercharger for my M, than we would have a straight line race. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 02:06 PM | #11 | |
Got Seoul?
116
Rep 2,862
Posts
Drives: 2012 535i MSport
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Honolulu
|
Quote:
Never! Why still thunder from the higher end sports car?
__________________
Can you say Alooooha?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC] |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 03:32 PM | #12 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 105
Posts |
Quote:
Like everyone has been saying, the M5 will probably have the M3 in 100+MPH range... but the M3 has got to be faster than the M5... there simply is no way to avoid it. Picture it like this: The 335i has been getting 0-60 times of 5~ seconds (even the auto!). Now are you telling me the M3 with lower weight (b/c we know they'll use better materials), better traction (b/c it has an LSD which will be better for acceleration because it doesn't brake the wheels to stop them from spinning ... PLUS it'll have bigger tires), better transmission (there's no denying it, the SMG is better than a regular stick shift in speed), and 100 HP+ (It will be AT LEAST 400HP) won't get more than a half of a second better 0-60 time? It's INSANE to say this car won't be faster than the M5 0-60. It simply doesn't seem comprehendable to me that all these factors thrown in will not yield more than .5 seconds 0-60. But what do I know... I'm just a mathematics major Plus, we don't even need to go into handling ... we already know that the M3 is the star when it comes to handling. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 04:41 PM | #13 | |
Major General
148
Rep 5,389
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod | | TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers | |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 05:20 PM | #14 |
Lieutenant
18
Rep 569
Posts |
0-60 figures I've seen
M45=5.7-5.9 E550=4.8-5.3 550i=5.2-5.6 M45 vs. 335 a drivers race? try again more like the driver of the 335 will win without a doubt The 550i will be a few car lengths behind or equal but past 100 that 4.8 will work its magic The E550 and a 335 will be dead even or the nod going to the E550. It has great gearing and more torque than the E60 M5 musters. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 09:44 PM | #15 |
1740
Rep 17,960
Posts
Drives: A Lot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: SF Bay, CA
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00]
2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00] |
Comparing 0-60mph is a pretty useless form of bench racing since, above a certain power output,it is largely dependant upon surface condition, tire pressures, gearing, driver, etc,.
0-60 tests become popular in the 80s when most "performance cars" did the run in 8 seconds. Now that today's cars performance cars are doing that in 1/2 that time, its becoming less and less useful to use the test as a useful benchmark. Arguing over 10ths of a second? Come on now. Average run to run variance can easily be 3/10ths of a second. As for acceleration testing, 0-100mph would be far more telling. But it's not something that we are used to seeing. just my 2c, shiv |
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 09:56 PM | #16 | |
Razor sharp handling
23
Rep 619
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
1997 E36 328is Arctic Silver: 1997-2003 100k Mi. SOLD
2000 Audi TT Quattro Coupe Lake Silver: 2003-present 35k Mi. SOLD 2006 Lotus Elise Polar Blue/Red 2007 E92 335i Spacegrau/Coral/Al | ZSP/ZPP/ZCW/CA/PDC/NAV Broken in |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-22-2006, 09:56 PM | #17 | |
Major General
148
Rep 5,389
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|2009 RENNtech MB C63 AMG | Black/Black Leather/Black Maple | Premium II | MultiMedia | iPod | | TeleAid | Charcoal Filter Delete | BMC High-Flow Air Filters | High-Flow Secondary Cats | Clear Side Markers | |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2006, 12:46 AM | #18 | |
Second Lieutenant
9
Rep 280
Posts |
Quote:
There are willing 545/550 drivers, one of which also owns an IS350 that would like to find out the results firsthand. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|