|
|
|
10-24-2009, 11:46 PM | #1 |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
My 135i doing a 1/4 mile simulation & dyno results
Pretty cool stuff. I'm sure this isn't incredibly accurate, but it went 12.33 @ 112 with a 2.02 60'. Sorry for the quality - I didn't have an actual video camera and had to settle for what this crappy camera could do:
Also, I dyno'd the car today with a couple of other Bimmers with various mods. The results were as-follows: 2008 BMW 135i w/Dinan Stage II: 282 whp / 317 lb-ft. 2008 BMW 135i w/JB+ set "relatively high": 286 whp / 310 lb-ft. 2008 BMW 135i w/JB3 (Map 7), Injen Intake, cp-e™ non-catted turboback exhaust: 317 whp / 355 lb-ft. 2008 BMW 335xi w/PROcede V3 (Stage II), AFE intake, AR non-catted downpipes & Autobahn Exotics catback exhaust: 306 whp / 324 lb-ft. (NOTE: this is what I recall for this car... I'm waiting for confirmation/correct numbers!) For reference: the first 135i listed made 262 whp / 275 lb-ft. BONE STOCK, last year. I know some will state that these #s are wrong/inaccurate, but not all dynos are built the same... I've grown to appreciate it's incredible consistency that's been proven over and over again. Also, I can tell you that any vehicle making over 300 whp / 320 lb-ft. on this dyno makes for an incredibly quick car.
__________________
|
10-25-2009, 01:04 AM | #2 |
First Lieutenant
12
Rep 369
Posts
Drives: 2009 BMW 135i
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Tustin, CA
|
Sounds good! Mustang dyno?
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-25-2009, 09:12 AM | #3 |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Thanks!
And yes, I prefer to roll my car on a dyno that places a load against the vehicle while testing.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-01-2009, 11:00 PM | #4 |
Sir Boost-a-Lot
18
Rep 519
Posts |
That sounds nice. What mode were you in during this run?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2009, 12:01 AM | #5 |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Thanks.
cp-e™ cat-back exhaust, cp-e™ non-catted downpipes, BMS JB3 v1.4 (Map 7) + O2 sim and Injen Dual Cone Intake.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2009, 02:14 AM | #6 |
Private
1
Rep 65
Posts |
The Time for 1/4 on the dino will be quicker because you don't have any wind resistance to slow you down. But that was pretty cool.
__________________
Blue water/Black leather/
6MT/Msport/Premium/Heated seats/Active steering/ Performance suspension |
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2009, 09:13 AM | #7 | |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Quote:
This was my first (and only) run EVER. This was on a damp track (got rained out shortly after my run), tires were fully inflated, a bunch of crap was in the trunk. Basically just wanted to see what it would do in "street trim." I'm guessing 12.33 isn't too far off.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2009, 09:02 AM | #9 |
Brigadier General
121
Rep 4,070
Posts |
Preferences aside I am really interested on what you would have put down on a Dynojet...care to wager a guess (of course purely speculative and w/SAE corr., etc, etc..)
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-11-2009, 04:24 PM | #10 | |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Quote:
And I know that "all Mustang dynos are heartbreakers," but I've honestly not seen another that reads as low as this one. Based on what my car put down, I'd have to imagine they'd be quite impressive on a Dynojet. Hit me with your guess and I'll let you know what Tony comes up with.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-12-2009, 09:28 AM | #11 |
Sir Boost-a-Lot
18
Rep 519
Posts |
I meant transmission wise what mode were you in? lol (Drive, Sport, Manual)
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2009, 09:28 AM | #12 | |
Brigadier General
121
Rep 4,070
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2009, 10:52 AM | #13 |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
His estimate is right around 350 hp / 380-390 ft-lbs.
And yes, it would vary... But only because that's how physics actually work. As far as dyno numbers go, they honestly don't do much for me... As they *ARE* just numbers and I generally put these events together for fun; however, when it comes to having the car tuned, I want it done on something that applies a load against the vehicle. That said, I'd much prefer my car get tuned on Mustang, Dyno Dynamics or simply out on the road.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2009, 02:08 PM | #14 | |
Brigadier General
121
Rep 4,070
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2009, 02:32 PM | #15 |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Yes. The load is based off of weight and the vehicle's RPM @ 50 mph. And to my understanding, the load rating comes from the DMV (or similar department that has access to said ratings/standards).
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2009, 04:42 PM | #16 |
Sir Boost-a-Lot
18
Rep 519
Posts |
?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-14-2009, 04:54 PM | #17 |
Major
144
Rep 1,262
Posts |
Sorry, meant to comment. It was in Sport mode for the 'launch' and 1-2 shift, then shifted manually at 6500 beyond that.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|