|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
MMP stage 3 Vs "Stage 2" turbo Lag differences
|
|
08-31-2017, 12:07 PM | #1 |
Captain
663
Rep 780
Posts |
MMP stage 3 Vs "Stage 2" turbo Lag differences
Does anyone have experience with the MMP stage 3's/Vargas GC turbos and regular stage 2 turbos (Pure stage 2, Vargas stage 2, RB's) that can explain the difference in turbo lag? Im looking at Stage 3 MMP's but im not sure ill like the added lag it offers over the standard stage 2 turbo's out there. I like to run my car hard in the corners and would hate to do a big single because of the lag.
|
08-31-2017, 01:21 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1933
Rep 1,532
Posts |
The high flow manifold of the GC's allow for significantly better low end and transient response over traditional modified stock manifold designs.
For clarification, all else equal, remember spool is a function of the aero characteristics of the wheels being used, lag is a time (time-to-torque) measurement. Spool is where in the RPM band you start making power at boost, lag is how long it takes to go from no boost to full boost once you're in the appropriate RPM band. They're in bed with each other but not the same thing. Low lag = the perception of better throttle response. Car feels more "alive". Chris |
09-05-2017, 10:42 AM | #5 |
First Lieutenant
234
Rep 317
Posts |
Here's a datalog comparison of my stock turbos on the MHD Stage 2+ map vs a VERY rough base tune of my MMPs.
I don't think you're giving up that much low end to be honest. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 10:48 AM | #6 |
First Lieutenant
234
Rep 317
Posts |
Here is a VirtualDyno comparison of the same logs. Remember that the MMP dyno (the one in red) is running no timing and has not been optimized at all, vs the fully developed (though general) Stage 2+ MHD tune.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 12:06 PM | #7 |
Private
36
Rep 66
Posts |
Nothing compares to stock like response, period.
Closest to stock for an upgrade stage 2 would be a 15t option
__________________
1-er
Staying stock and watching things unfold |
Appreciate
1
Chris@VargasTurboTech1933.00 |
09-05-2017, 02:40 PM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
234
Rep 317
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 02:45 PM | #9 | |
Private
36
Rep 66
Posts |
Quote:
Pros & cons sir. I've yet to see a log of a stock turbo car struggling to maintain boost at 3800rpm... If you meant past say 5500 I'd agree with you.
__________________
1-er
Staying stock and watching things unfold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 09:47 PM | #10 | |
First Lieutenant
234
Rep 317
Posts |
Quote:
I do have a stage 2 LPFP, but I'm not interested in port injection. No need for PI on pump gas, I wouldn't feel comfortable going above 500 whp on pump. With just a stage 2 lpfp, another 75 whp should be in range. I'll just have to be happy with 550 - 600whp without PI, or get a shotgun hpfp and go for 650. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-05-2017, 10:50 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1933
Rep 1,532
Posts |
A 19T does not have stock like response, IF all else is equal. It can come close, if properly plumbed/etc. etc. but it's not going to match those little baby hair dryers. It is a great wheel though -absolutely love the 19T's on a 3 liter motor. Responsiveness wise, though, there is a definite increase in responsiveness going from the 19T's in the GC's down to the 16T's on the lites. Huge flow manifold plus smaller compressor = weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Chris |
Appreciate
2
1hunglow35.50 |
09-08-2017, 05:19 PM | #12 | |
Captain
663
Rep 780
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-09-2017, 12:13 AM | #13 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
1933
Rep 1,532
Posts |
Quote:
It's a 16T compressor, so you can do upper 6's, but since the GC manifolds flow so well, you'll gain a little power there, full out maxed tune probably close to 700 but if that's your goal... go up a size. You'll be leaning on them hard. The 650 we did was on a motor with significant leakdown issues. Chris |
|
Appreciate
2
natedog7700663.00 |
Bookmarks |
|
|