E90Post
 


 
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum > E90 / E92 / E93 3-series Powertrain and Drivetrain Discussions > N54 Turbo Engine / Drivetrain / Exhaust Modifications - 335i > How much of a nosedive did your MPG take after a tune?



Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      06-27-2016, 07:59 PM   #1
aohus
First Lieutenant
aohus's Avatar
163
Rep
376
Posts

Drives: 2010 Monaco Blue 335i
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern California

iTrader: (0)

How much of a nosedive did your MPG take after a tune?

After doing a Stage 1 MHD tune, I would normally have to fill up once a week. I now have to fill up about once every 5-6 days. And this is from normal driving (to and from work commute).

I'm aware this is expected, but wondering what others are getting.

YMMV. Literally.
__________________
2010 E92 Monaco Blue 335i / Gray Dakota Leather / Steptronic / Sport / Premium / Navi / L7 / 18" Performance Wheels / HPFP fail @ 8400 miles (replaced with #933 pump) // MODS: Mishimoto OCC | VRSF CP + Turbosmart Dual Port BOV | RB PCV Valve // Maintenance: Walnut Blast @ 56k | Spark Plugs Replaced @ 56k | Addons: BN2000 Combox // Andream Carplay // Rear Camera // Spark Plugs (.022 gap) and Coils Replaced 73.1k
2019 G01 Carbon Black X3 M40i / Premium / Driver Assist / 21" on Bridgestone Alienza RFT
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2016, 08:09 PM   #2
Antetokounmpo
Brigadier General
Antetokounmpo's Avatar
United_States
1552
Rep
3,475
Posts

Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Depends how much you punch it. If you don't ever go past stock boost (8.5 psi or something) you should theoretically get exactly the same mileage since the afr under light load shouldn't be changed in the tune.
__________________

2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+
BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq.
2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast
Appreciate 1
      06-27-2016, 08:18 PM   #3
aohus
First Lieutenant
aohus's Avatar
163
Rep
376
Posts

Drives: 2010 Monaco Blue 335i
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heel Toe View Post
Depends how much you punch it. If you don't ever go past stock boost (8.5 psi or something) you should theoretically get exactly the same mileage since the afr under light load shouldn't be changed in the tune.
I will need to buy a boost gauge then. If anyone can chime in for a good boost gauge recommendation I'm all ears. I was looking into the P3 but what else is out there ?
__________________
2010 E92 Monaco Blue 335i / Gray Dakota Leather / Steptronic / Sport / Premium / Navi / L7 / 18" Performance Wheels / HPFP fail @ 8400 miles (replaced with #933 pump) // MODS: Mishimoto OCC | VRSF CP + Turbosmart Dual Port BOV | RB PCV Valve // Maintenance: Walnut Blast @ 56k | Spark Plugs Replaced @ 56k | Addons: BN2000 Combox // Andream Carplay // Rear Camera // Spark Plugs (.022 gap) and Coils Replaced 73.1k
2019 G01 Carbon Black X3 M40i / Premium / Driver Assist / 21" on Bridgestone Alienza RFT
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2016, 08:18 PM   #4
Antetokounmpo
Brigadier General
Antetokounmpo's Avatar
United_States
1552
Rep
3,475
Posts

Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Here is a comparison between a stock fuel table and custom fuel table. As you can see the stock fuel table is actually richer (first table). So technically, with exactly the same driving habits (keeping under 8.5psi) you'll achieve better fuel mileage with the aftermarket tune.

Now, since you won't be able to keep out of boost, you'll get worse mileage.
Attached Images
  
__________________

2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+
BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq.
2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast
Appreciate 2
      06-27-2016, 08:56 PM   #5
V8bait
Lieutenant
406
Rep
574
Posts

Drives: e92 335i 6mt
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Houston

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Heel Toe View Post
Here is a comparison between a stock fuel table and custom fuel table. As you can see the stock fuel table is actually richer (first table). So technically, with exactly the same driving habits (keeping under 8.5psi) you'll achieve better fuel mileage with the aftermarket tune.

Now, since you won't be able to keep out of boost, you'll get worse mileage.
Interesting fuel table heh.

A stage 1 MHD tune will probably be a bit richer than that table, but between the more aggressive cam timing and more aggressive boost profiles in tunes, your fuel economy will take a slight hit if you decide to touch the loud pedal OP.
Appreciate 1
      06-27-2016, 08:59 PM   #6
tofu?
Second Lieutenant
88
Rep
242
Posts

Drives: e92 n54
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NYC 11385

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aohus View Post
I will need to buy a boost gauge then. If anyone can chime in for a good boost gauge recommendation I'm all ears. I was looking into the P3 but what else is out there ?
yes, throw money at useless parts instead of driving like a normal human to preserve mpg
Appreciate 2
      06-27-2016, 09:11 PM   #7
bradsm87
Lieutenant Colonel
Australia
595
Rep
1,693
Posts

Drives: F25 LCI xDrive30d
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

When driving the same, my mileage is way better than stock with a custom tune.
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2016, 09:34 PM   #8
aohus
First Lieutenant
aohus's Avatar
163
Rep
376
Posts

Drives: 2010 Monaco Blue 335i
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradsm87 View Post
When driving the same, my mileage is way better than stock with a custom tune.
How is that even possible?

Quote:
Originally Posted by tofu? View Post
yes, throw money at useless parts instead of driving like a normal human to preserve mpg
What makes you think I don't?
__________________
2010 E92 Monaco Blue 335i / Gray Dakota Leather / Steptronic / Sport / Premium / Navi / L7 / 18" Performance Wheels / HPFP fail @ 8400 miles (replaced with #933 pump) // MODS: Mishimoto OCC | VRSF CP + Turbosmart Dual Port BOV | RB PCV Valve // Maintenance: Walnut Blast @ 56k | Spark Plugs Replaced @ 56k | Addons: BN2000 Combox // Andream Carplay // Rear Camera // Spark Plugs (.022 gap) and Coils Replaced 73.1k
2019 G01 Carbon Black X3 M40i / Premium / Driver Assist / 21" on Bridgestone Alienza RFT
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2016, 09:48 PM   #9
3.1L Z
Private First Class
3.1L Z's Avatar
26
Rep
186
Posts

Drives: '09 E92, Cobb AP
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Antonio

iTrader: (0)

I've wondered if the mpg computer changes with a tune??? Or does it just measure throttle and rpm to calculate the estimate mpg...
__________________

'11 E92, MSport
3 Pedal 3.1L Stroker Z
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2016, 09:55 PM   #10
mikes4
Private
13
Rep
91
Posts

Drives: none
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Savannah, GA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradsm87
When driving the same, my mileage is way better than stock with a custom tune.
Ditto
Appreciate 0
      06-27-2016, 10:03 PM   #11
bradsm87
Lieutenant Colonel
Australia
595
Rep
1,693
Posts

Drives: F25 LCI xDrive30d
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3.1L Z View Post
I've wondered if the mpg computer changes with a tune??? Or does it just measure throttle and rpm to calculate the estimate mpg...
It's quite accurate and based on fuel injected.
Appreciate 1
      06-27-2016, 10:04 PM   #12
bradsm87
Lieutenant Colonel
Australia
595
Rep
1,693
Posts

Drives: F25 LCI xDrive30d
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aohus View Post
How is that even possible?
No EGR, leaner, more advanced timing. Less thermal loss and less pumping loss.
Appreciate 3
      06-27-2016, 10:12 PM   #13
Antetokounmpo
Brigadier General
Antetokounmpo's Avatar
United_States
1552
Rep
3,475
Posts

Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by V8bait View Post
Interesting fuel table heh.

A stage 1 MHD tune will probably be a bit richer than that table, but between the more aggressive cam timing and more aggressive boost profiles in tunes, your fuel economy will take a slight hit if you decide to touch the loud pedal OP.
Yeah agreed. I'd be willing to be under 130 load, the fuel target is OEM with MHD stage 1/2. But I cannot find a mhd stage 1/2 bin...
__________________

2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+
BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq.
2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast
Appreciate 0
      06-28-2016, 03:03 AM   #14
Riceball777
Lieutenant
163
Rep
466
Posts

Drives: S2000 618whp/ e90 335i
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Los Angeles

iTrader: (0)

the only reason your gas millage would be worse is because your driving more aggressively or your keeping the car in boost more. Since all stock tunes run on the rich side and all aftermarket tunes run the car leaner if you stay out of boost your gas millage will actually be better with a aftermarket/custom tune over the stock tune.
__________________
2007 e90 335i
pure stage 2 DD turbos, rb inlets
Appreciate 0
      06-28-2016, 05:47 AM   #15
Rory
Lieutenant
Rory's Avatar
United Kingdom
93
Rep
299
Posts

Drives: E92 335i SE 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2005 Z4 3.0 6MT  [0.00]
2007 335i 6MT  [0.00]
Im surprised tunes actually run leaner than stock, you'd think the tuners would run a little richer for safety.
__________________
2007 E92 335i 6MT | MHD Stage 1 + | Mishimoto Intercooler | Z4 Airbox mod
Appreciate 1
mnnguy4.50
      06-28-2016, 08:00 AM   #16
Antetokounmpo
Brigadier General
Antetokounmpo's Avatar
United_States
1552
Rep
3,475
Posts

Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory View Post
Im surprised tunes actually run leaner than stock, you'd think the tuners would run a little richer for safety.
That's a custom tune, (not made by me) but in low loads, it's really not much leaner, just a few tenths leaner. I'd can almost guarantee you the MHD stage 1/2 bins have the same afr as stock under 130 load.

As for high load, the stock tune runs pig rich for a DI engine. Hence why tuners will lean out the afr in the high loads (which the stock tune will never see)
__________________

2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+
BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq.
2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast
Appreciate 0
      06-28-2016, 08:11 AM   #17
Fundguy1
Major General
Fundguy1's Avatar
2032
Rep
8,339
Posts

Drives: 335 e93
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Orlando, fl

iTrader: (0)

A couple mpg after a jb4 tune. After switching to my current setup and e85 10 mpg. Course I have a fuel rail and close to 700hp which I use.
Appreciate 1
      06-28-2016, 03:24 PM   #18
blau iii
Lieutenant
128
Rep
451
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i schwartz on scwartz
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Pittsburgh

iTrader: (0)

I got the vent boost guage from EAS. it's great but having it right in your face makes your foot go down more and in turn, worse mpg.
Appreciate 1
      06-28-2016, 07:03 PM   #19
bradsm87
Lieutenant Colonel
Australia
595
Rep
1,693
Posts

Drives: F25 LCI xDrive30d
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Australia

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rory View Post
Im surprised tunes actually run leaner than stock, you'd think the tuners would run a little richer for safety.
Low loads don't need to run rich to be sufficiently cooled. The fuel map has different air fuel ratios at all RPM and load. During cruise, going leaner than the already 14.7:1 factory AFR does not significantly increase heat like it does when going from say 12:1 to 14:1. Going leaner than around 15.5:1 actually gets cooler from that point onwards.

Under high load, most tunes run a bit richer than factory at low RPM, about the same as factory in the midrange and a little leaner at very high RPM. This is because the factory tune runs quite lean for emissions purposes at low RPM and runs quite rich at high RPM.
Appreciate 0
      06-28-2016, 07:26 PM   #20
Speed3Driver
Registered
United_States
0
Rep
3
Posts

Drives: 2008 335i e93
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: south jersey

iTrader: (0)

mine went up 2-3 mpg highway with the jb 4 map 5 i've been driving the same road to work for 5 years at the same 83mph indicated on speedo
Appreciate 0
      06-28-2016, 07:27 PM   #21
Bumbleb
Private
14
Rep
59
Posts

Drives: 2008 e92
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Florida

iTrader: (0)

Took a huge hit when I switched to full E85 but who cares when those turbos spool.
Appreciate 0
      06-28-2016, 07:36 PM   #22
08njSTEP
Captain
08njSTEP's Avatar
795
Rep
762
Posts

Drives: '07 335i, '66 SS396 Chevelle
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Manchester, NH

iTrader: (0)

First couple weeks after installing COBB I was getting 19.9-20.1 with AFR between 14.3-15.1. Now I'm getting 21.7. Same AFR, same driving habits, same route. I see 15-16psi boost.
Appreciate 0
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:18 AM.




e90post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST