|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
How much of a nosedive did your MPG take after a tune?
|
|
06-27-2016, 07:59 PM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
163
Rep 376
Posts |
How much of a nosedive did your MPG take after a tune?
After doing a Stage 1 MHD tune, I would normally have to fill up once a week. I now have to fill up about once every 5-6 days. And this is from normal driving (to and from work commute).
I'm aware this is expected, but wondering what others are getting. YMMV. Literally.
__________________
2010 E92 Monaco Blue 335i / Gray Dakota Leather / Steptronic / Sport / Premium / Navi / L7 / 18" Performance Wheels / HPFP fail @ 8400 miles (replaced with #933 pump) // MODS: Mishimoto OCC | VRSF CP + Turbosmart Dual Port BOV | RB PCV Valve // Maintenance: Walnut Blast @ 56k | Spark Plugs Replaced @ 56k | Addons: BN2000 Combox // Andream Carplay // Rear Camera // Spark Plugs (.022 gap) and Coils Replaced 73.1k
2019 G01 Carbon Black X3 M40i / Premium / Driver Assist / 21" on Bridgestone Alienza RFT |
06-27-2016, 08:09 PM | #2 |
Brigadier General
1552
Rep 3,475
Posts
Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI
|
Depends how much you punch it. If you don't ever go past stock boost (8.5 psi or something) you should theoretically get exactly the same mileage since the afr under light load shouldn't be changed in the tune.
__________________
2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+ BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq. 2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast |
Appreciate
1
|
06-27-2016, 08:18 PM | #3 |
First Lieutenant
163
Rep 376
Posts |
I will need to buy a boost gauge then. If anyone can chime in for a good boost gauge recommendation I'm all ears. I was looking into the P3 but what else is out there ?
__________________
2010 E92 Monaco Blue 335i / Gray Dakota Leather / Steptronic / Sport / Premium / Navi / L7 / 18" Performance Wheels / HPFP fail @ 8400 miles (replaced with #933 pump) // MODS: Mishimoto OCC | VRSF CP + Turbosmart Dual Port BOV | RB PCV Valve // Maintenance: Walnut Blast @ 56k | Spark Plugs Replaced @ 56k | Addons: BN2000 Combox // Andream Carplay // Rear Camera // Spark Plugs (.022 gap) and Coils Replaced 73.1k
2019 G01 Carbon Black X3 M40i / Premium / Driver Assist / 21" on Bridgestone Alienza RFT |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2016, 08:18 PM | #4 |
Brigadier General
1552
Rep 3,475
Posts
Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI
|
Here is a comparison between a stock fuel table and custom fuel table. As you can see the stock fuel table is actually richer (first table). So technically, with exactly the same driving habits (keeping under 8.5psi) you'll achieve better fuel mileage with the aftermarket tune.
Now, since you won't be able to keep out of boost, you'll get worse mileage.
__________________
2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+ BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq. 2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast |
Appreciate
2
|
06-27-2016, 08:56 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant
406
Rep 574
Posts |
Quote:
A stage 1 MHD tune will probably be a bit richer than that table, but between the more aggressive cam timing and more aggressive boost profiles in tunes, your fuel economy will take a slight hit if you decide to touch the loud pedal OP. |
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-27-2016, 08:59 PM | #6 |
Second Lieutenant
88
Rep 242
Posts |
|
Appreciate
2
|
06-27-2016, 09:34 PM | #8 | |
First Lieutenant
163
Rep 376
Posts |
Quote:
What makes you think I don't?
__________________
2010 E92 Monaco Blue 335i / Gray Dakota Leather / Steptronic / Sport / Premium / Navi / L7 / 18" Performance Wheels / HPFP fail @ 8400 miles (replaced with #933 pump) // MODS: Mishimoto OCC | VRSF CP + Turbosmart Dual Port BOV | RB PCV Valve // Maintenance: Walnut Blast @ 56k | Spark Plugs Replaced @ 56k | Addons: BN2000 Combox // Andream Carplay // Rear Camera // Spark Plugs (.022 gap) and Coils Replaced 73.1k
2019 G01 Carbon Black X3 M40i / Premium / Driver Assist / 21" on Bridgestone Alienza RFT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2016, 09:48 PM | #9 |
Private First Class
26
Rep 186
Posts |
I've wondered if the mpg computer changes with a tune??? Or does it just measure throttle and rpm to calculate the estimate mpg...
__________________
'11 E92, MSport 3 Pedal 3.1L Stroker Z |
Appreciate
0
|
06-27-2016, 10:03 PM | #11 |
Lieutenant Colonel
595
Rep 1,693
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
|
06-27-2016, 10:12 PM | #13 |
Brigadier General
1552
Rep 3,475
Posts
Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI
|
Yeah agreed. I'd be willing to be under 130 load, the fuel target is OEM with MHD stage 1/2. But I cannot find a mhd stage 1/2 bin...
__________________
2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+ BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq. 2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2016, 03:03 AM | #14 |
Lieutenant
163
Rep 466
Posts |
the only reason your gas millage would be worse is because your driving more aggressively or your keeping the car in boost more. Since all stock tunes run on the rich side and all aftermarket tunes run the car leaner if you stay out of boost your gas millage will actually be better with a aftermarket/custom tune over the stock tune.
__________________
2007 e90 335i
pure stage 2 DD turbos, rb inlets |
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2016, 05:47 AM | #15 |
Lieutenant
93
Rep 299
Posts
Drives: E92 335i SE 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
|
Im surprised tunes actually run leaner than stock, you'd think the tuners would run a little richer for safety.
__________________
2007 E92 335i 6MT | MHD Stage 1 + | Mishimoto Intercooler | Z4 Airbox mod
|
Appreciate
1
mnnguy4.50 |
06-28-2016, 08:00 AM | #16 | |
Brigadier General
1552
Rep 3,475
Posts
Drives: E90 6MT FBO; '18 F150 Platinum
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: WI
|
Quote:
As for high load, the stock tune runs pig rich for a DI engine. Hence why tuners will lean out the afr in the high loads (which the stock tune will never see)
__________________
2008 335xi 6MT | VRSF Catless DP | VRSF 7" FMIC | VRSF CP | TIAL BOV | DCI | MHD 2+ BC Racing BR | Stoptech 600 | Firehawk Indy 500 255 Square | Atric Altimax 225 Sq. 2018 F-150 Platinum 701A | FX4 | 3.5 EcoBeast |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2016, 07:03 PM | #19 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
595
Rep 1,693
Posts |
Quote:
Under high load, most tunes run a bit richer than factory at low RPM, about the same as factory in the midrange and a little leaner at very high RPM. This is because the factory tune runs quite lean for emissions purposes at low RPM and runs quite rich at high RPM. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-28-2016, 07:36 PM | #22 |
Captain
795
Rep 762
Posts |
First couple weeks after installing COBB I was getting 19.9-20.1 with AFR between 14.3-15.1. Now I'm getting 21.7. Same AFR, same driving habits, same route. I see 15-16psi boost.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|