Haven't Heard A Tease About v2.0.3 Lately

lawdude · 01-05-2008, 08:48 PM

Have I missed something?

hGX2 · 01-05-2008, 09:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawdude

Have I missed something?

Good question!! For as many that have had issues there are many more who have not! v2.03 bring it on!!

normtrum · 01-05-2008, 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Railgun

What reason would there be for a 2.0.3?

Maybe launch control? IDK, there's always something he seems to be working on.

Vince@ V K Motorwerks · 01-05-2008, 10:01 PM

mmmmm....Launch control

335iheLLraiseR · 01-05-2008, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Railgun

What reason would there be for a 2.0.3?

O2 simulator for those running catless DPs, and are recieving CELs, the low end torque which was removed with 2.02, and knowing Shiv, about 5-8 more rwhp. Launch control would be nice but i highly doubt it for 2.03, maybe 2.04 or 2.05, the ever elusive DP map considering the fact the Shiv already recieved a set.

thats just to name a few.

hGX2 · 01-06-2008, 07:48 PM

Overboost as previously discussed in many threads.....

musc · 01-06-2008, 08:21 PM

So this is kind of a related question. How do you go about chosing the number for the next upgrade? For example there was v1.2, 1.3, 1.4. Then there was a 1.5 that didn't work then back to 1.4x to the 1.47. Now with V2 its 2.01, 2.02 etc. Why not 2.1, 2.2 etc.? Is there a formula that developers use or is it completely random? I always wondered this

O-cha · 01-06-2008, 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by catm3

Is there a formula that developers use or is it completely random? I always wondered this

Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Version_history

musc · 01-06-2008, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O-cha

Yes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Version_history

Very cool. Thank you!

Sniz · 01-06-2008, 10:08 PM

I'd like to see a tune for downpipes with high flow cats and for those of use running intercoolers. Helix has seen nice gains by tuning for their intercooler, hopefully shiv can do the same.

O-cha · 01-06-2008, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sniz

I'd like to see a tune for downpipes with high flow cats and for those of use running intercoolers. Helix has seen nice gains by tuning for their intercooler, hopefully shiv can do the same.

I don't think they specifically tuned for it. Not much to do that the ECU doesn't.

Sniz · 01-06-2008, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O-cha

I don't think they specifically tuned for it. Not much to do that the ECU doesn't.

They r claiming they picked up 22hp by tuning for the intercooler....see here:

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=592

O-cha · 01-06-2008, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sniz

They r claiming they picked up 22hp by tuning for the intercooler....see here:

http://www.e90post.com/forums/showpo...&postcount=592

No they picked up 22hp by installing the IC not "tuning for it" There's nothing to tune, unless maybe they were limiting boost without it and added some, but I see no mention of that nor is it likely.

down4it · 01-07-2008, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O-cha

No they picked up 22hp by installing the IC not "tuning for it" There's nothing to tune, unless maybe they were limiting boost without it and added some, but I see no mention of that nor is it likely.

I think you should read it again, they picked up 22whp and 6wtq by tuning for the FMIC... You can advance the timing further with an upgraded FMIC from what i understand thats where you can pull more power from. I hope Shiv gets one and tunes for it...

Sniz · 01-07-2008, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by down4it

I think you should read it again, they picked up 22whp and 6wtq by tuning for the FMIC... You can advance the timing further with an upgraded FMIC from what i understand thats where you can pull more power from. I hope Shiv gets one and tunes for it...

+1, I got a PM from them about this as well.....they had to tune for the denser air mixture so I'm assuming that let them add in a little more boost and timing. They said the HP was tapering off more after 5500rpms once the intercooler was installed before they tuned for it, afterwards it stayed stronger to redline thus the extra 22hp. Honestly if Shiv doesn't address the intercooler I may give the Attache a testrun and see how I like it, I already have Helix's intercooler so it couldn't hurt. Also interested in their intake.

OpenFlash · 01-07-2008, 11:36 AM

Don't worry guys. We'll tune for an intercooler as soon as we finish the DP setting. To be honest, there's really not much tuning to do with an IC. It's one of the mods that is passively effective. Lower charge temps mean you can run a bit more boost at higher rpm. Lower pressure loss means turbos run more efficiently at the same manifold pressure. AFR is self corrective via closed loop fuel control. All of which results in a power gain. How much power gain depends on just how much better the upgraded IC performs.

Shiv

Sniz · 01-07-2008, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Don't worry guys. We'll tune for an intercooler as soon as we finish the DP setting. To be honest, there's really not much tuning to do with an IC. It's one of the mods that is passively effective. Lower charge temps mean you can run a bit more boost at higher rpm. Lower pressure loss means turbos run more efficiently at the same manifold pressure. AFR is self corrective via closed loop fuel control. All of which results in a power gain. How much power gain depends on just how much better the upgraded IC performs.

Shiv

O-cha · 01-07-2008, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sniz

+1, I got a PM from them about this as well.....they had to tune for the denser air mixture so I'm assuming that let them add in a little more boost and timing. They said the HP was tapering off more after 5500rpms once the intercooler was installed before they tuned for it, afterwards it stayed stronger to redline thus the extra 22hp. Honestly if Shiv doesn't address the intercooler I may give the Attache a testrun and see how I like it, I already have Helix's intercooler so it couldn't hurt. Also interested in their intake.

You mean they did something like this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by O-cha

There's nothing to tune, unless maybe they were limiting boost without it and added some, but I see no mention of that nor is it likely.

Doesn't change the fact though that that post said nothing about tuning for the IC, just had a dyno saying the FMIC was installed, nothing about tuning.

Quote:

Originally Posted by down4it

I think you should read it again, they picked up 22whp and 6wtq by tuning for the FMIC... You can advance the timing further with an upgraded FMIC from what i understand thats where you can pull more power from. I hope Shiv gets one and tunes for it...

No the ecu will advance all the timing it can.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

Don't worry guys. We'll tune for an intercooler as soon as we finish the DP setting.

So sometime in August.

Quote:

Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu

To be honest, there's really not much tuning to do with an IC. It's one of the mods that is passively effective. Lower charge temps mean you can run a bit more boost at higher rpm. Lower pressure loss means turbos run more efficiently at the same manifold pressure.

Holy wow that sounds so familiar.

e.n335 · 01-07-2008, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O-cha

You mean they did something like this?

Doesn't change the fact though that that post said nothing about tuning for the IC, just had a dyno saying the FMIC was installed, nothing about tuning.

No the ecu will advance all the timing it can.

So sometime in August.

Holy wow that sounds so familiar.

Have a bad day ?

E90ice · 01-07-2008, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O-cha

You mean they did something like this?

Doesn't change the fact though that that post said nothing about tuning for the IC, just had a dyno saying the FMIC was installed, nothing about tuning.

No the ecu will advance all the timing it can.

So sometime in August.

Holy wow that sounds so familiar.

Why are you being an ass, man?

Can you be a little more constructive, instead of wasting yours and our time with nonsense?

BoostedBMW · 01-07-2008, 05:28 PM

O-cha has a lot of knowledge of FI, but in most of his posts he comes off as being an arrogant douche. I don't see the need for it, but if that makes you feel like a bigger man then more power to ya.

O-cha · 01-07-2008, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoostedBMW

O-cha has a lot of knowledge of FI, but in most of his posts he comes off as being an arrogant douche. I don't see the need for it, but if that makes you feel like a bigger man then more power to ya.

We will make you my proxy poster, ill send you my post and you edit it for arrogant douchyness and post it for me.

01-05-2008, 08:48 PM	#1
lawdude Colonel 93 Rep 2,339 Posts Drives: 335i ZPP ZSP TiAg MT Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Georgia iTrader: (1)	Haven't Heard A Tease About v2.0.3 Lately Have I missed something?
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

01-05-2008, 10:01 PM	#4
Vince@ V K Motorwerks Lieutenant Colonel 148 Rep 1,738 Posts Drives: 01 Black 911 Turbo, 09 X5 Join Date: May 2007 Location: Bloomingdale, IL iTrader: (0)	mmmmm....Launch control
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-06-2008, 07:48 PM	#6
hGX2 Private First Class 6 Rep 179 Posts Drives: 2012 X5 50i Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Midwest iTrader: (6)	Overboost as previously discussed in many threads.....
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-06-2008, 08:21 PM	#7
musc ****** 184 Rep 1,702 Posts Drives: Audi TTRS, 335is Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: SC iTrader: (9) Garage List 2011 BMW 335is [10.00]	So this is kind of a related question. How do you go about chosing the number for the next upgrade? For example there was v1.2, 1.3, 1.4. Then there was a 1.5 that didn't work then back to 1.4x to the 1.47. Now with V2 its 2.01, 2.02 etc. Why not 2.1, 2.2 etc.? Is there a formula that developers use or is it completely random? I always wondered this
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-06-2008, 10:08 PM	#10
Sniz Lieutenant General 654 Rep 10,587 Posts Drives: e92 335 - gone // e36 M3 turbo Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Ellicott City, MD iTrader: (1)	I'd like to see a tune for downpipes with high flow cats and for those of use running intercoolers. Helix has seen nice gains by tuning for their intercooler, hopefully shiv can do the same. __________________
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-07-2008, 11:36 AM	#16
OpenFlash 1737 Rep 17,960 Posts Drives: A Lot Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: SF Bay, CA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2018 Ducati Panigal ... [0.00] 2016 Mazda CX5 [0.00] 2017 Aprilia Tuono ... [0.00] 2019 BMW M2 Competi ... [0.00] 2015 BMW M5 Competi ... [10.00] 2016 Ducati XDiavel S [0.00] 2016 AMG GT S [0.00] 2011 Ferrari 458 It ... [0.00] 2017 Charger Hellcat [0.00] 2015 KTM Super Duke ... [0.00] 2016 KTM RC390 [0.00]	Don't worry guys. We'll tune for an intercooler as soon as we finish the DP setting. To be honest, there's really not much tuning to do with an IC. It's one of the mods that is passively effective. Lower charge temps mean you can run a bit more boost at higher rpm. Lower pressure loss means turbos run more efficiently at the same manifold pressure. AFR is self corrective via closed loop fuel control. All of which results in a power gain. How much power gain depends on just how much better the upgraded IC performs. Shiv
	Appreciate 0 Quote

01-07-2008, 05:28 PM	#21
BoostedBMW Moderator 132 Rep 6,775 Posts Drives: TiAg E92 335 Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Raleigh, NC iTrader: (14) Garage List 2003 S2000 [0.00]	O-cha has a lot of knowledge of FI, but in most of his posts he comes off as being an arrogant douche. I don't see the need for it, but if that makes you feel like a bigger man then more power to ya. __________________ -Michael. Berlina Black S2000 CR is now in the garage l 19" Rial Daytona Race l KW V2 l Eisenhaus Race Exhaust l
	Appreciate 0 Quote