|
|
SUPPORT ZPOST BY DOING YOUR TIRERACK SHOPPING FROM THIS BANNER, THANKS! |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
01-14-2008, 12:55 AM | #1 |
Private First Class
12
Rep 118
Posts |
Sway Bars - Who has installed them? Please come inside.
Hi everyone,
I am starting to modify the coupe finally (got 2,500 miles on her already). Anyhow, with my old 350z the single-most impressive modification that I did to that car was the addition of a set of Hotchkis sway bars (bang for the buck). I am wondering if the M coupe will see the same benefit. I see the advertised stiffness increase vs. 3.0si sport, but not vs. M. So I am not sure how stiff the existing M bars are. If any owners have installed these on any of their coupes, please share your thoughts on the results. Thanks, Jim |
01-14-2008, 01:32 AM | #2 |
More than you can afford pal....ferrari
181
Rep 1,471
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 03:11 PM | #3 |
Major
61
Rep 1,210
Posts |
Uh, he said Sway Bars not Strut Bar. The link you sent him to is for a strut bar. I've never seen a thread for sway bar install didn't know anyone made one either.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2008, 03:23 PM | #4 |
Captain
55
Rep 815
Posts |
I know H&R and Hotchkis make bars for the Z. Stock diameters on the 3.0si are 25/19mm F/R (24/18mm for non-Sport) and the aftermarket bars are something like 27/21mm. I believe the torsional stiffness of a bar varies with diameter squared so if the end link geometry is the same I'd say the stiffness of the aftermarket bars is something like 15-20% greater than stock. Aftermarket bars are usually adjustable though, so this is just a first cut.
Update: A couple of things. First the M bars are significantly thicker than those on the 3.0si - realOEM says 27/22.5mm F/R. Also while 27/21mm is correct for the H&R bars, the Hotchkis are quite a bit bigger. Here's specs I downloaded... Specifications: - Front 28.5mm Tubular 3 Position Adjustable - Stiffness: +19%,+38%+61% (Compared to stock Z4 Sport) - Rear 24mm Tubular 2 Position Adjustable - Stiffness +59%, +86% (Compared to stock Z4 Sport with 24mm front and 19mm rear) It looks like the aftermarket bars I'm seeing are for the non-M Z4s. I don't know if the M and non-M bars are interchangeable. Regardless, it looks like the H&R bars are roughly the stiffness of the stock M bars, while the Hotchkis set up is subtantially stiffer than either. It would be nice to find out if the M and non-M bars are swappable as lots of us 3.0si drivers would probably just as soon install stock M bars as an aftermarket kit. Update 2: A careful reading of realOEM shows that the part numbers for the end links the sway bars fit into are the same for the M and non-M Z4 coupes. I suspect this means that they are interchangeable (but somebody should definitely verify this before ordering anything). Last edited by vachss; 01-14-2008 at 04:06 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2008, 07:18 PM | #5 |
Private First Class
13
Rep 136
Posts |
I have the hotchkis sway bars myself and absolutely love them. They really did a job on stiffening up the ride and reducing body roll. But in comparison to the ///M factory bars, it appearss to be a very small upgrade. Maybe the difference won't be as noticable. And then there is the question of fitment as well. I thought that the ///MZ4 shared most of its rear suspension from the M3?
__________________
2003 Maldives Blue 2.5i -- 18" M6 wheels, 12mm rear spacer, ///MZ4 front bumper conversion, Eibach lowering springs, Koni shocks, Hotchkis F/R anti-roll bars, Helene Performance air filter.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2009, 09:12 AM | #8 |
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep 231
Posts |
Bringing this post back a little bit.
For those who have added sway bars, I just want to confirm something: It should be a noticable reduction in body roll, right?? I upgraded my front only, since SCCA permits fooling with the front only in stock classes. My goal was to reduce body roll and a host of other things that should be beneficial despite the potential for increased understeer. I have the H&R bar at the stiffest setting and noticed zero difference. I cannot see any damaged end links or other problems, but felt there should be at least some noticeable difference. The difference between 3.0i sport and H&R is still a few mm in thickness... something seems strange, and the body roll still exists.
__________________
FS: Leather Recaro Pole Position Seats & Hardware |
Appreciate
0
|
05-10-2009, 05:40 PM | #9 |
Private First Class
5
Rep 145
Posts |
in my last car, mazda 3.. sway bar was more effective than springs in reducing bodyroll...
only reason i havn't done it to the Z4, is i was "hoping" for the same result, but you just gave me doubt.. can someone please confirm? |
Appreciate
0
|
05-16-2009, 06:37 PM | #10 |
Second Lieutenant
20
Rep 231
Posts |
To clarify my previous post: there IS a very noticable difference with the front sway only. My observations were skewed because I had a bad sway bar link.
After replacing that, the front is way tighter. It understeers like hell, but for daily driving it is way better. I am referring to H&R at the stiffest setting. Another unintended benefit is that the steering wheel feels heavier and more precise. I want now to get the rear as well, but first have to review the scca categories that I could compete in should I do the rear.
__________________
FS: Leather Recaro Pole Position Seats & Hardware |
Appreciate
0
|
05-19-2009, 02:44 PM | #11 | |
Major
55
Rep 1,224
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
If you can't take the time to teach a kid something good, someone will take the time to teach them something bad.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2009, 03:18 PM | #12 |
Second Lieutenant
7
Rep 257
Posts |
Talk to Palantirion about his Ground Control sways...he knows his stuff.
__________________
ESS Tuning Software, JVT (Ebay) Headers, AFE Intake, RPI Scoop, ACS Pedals, and ZHP Shift Knob.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-21-2009, 04:08 PM | #13 |
Major
55
Rep 1,224
Posts |
Good advice, should have talked to Earl first thing. Thanks.
__________________
If you can't take the time to teach a kid something good, someone will take the time to teach them something bad.
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2009, 01:22 PM | #14 |
New Member
1
Rep 26
Posts |
What about the M Coupe bars?? THis is for the M roadster crowd..
I think I read somewhere that the M Coupe Bars are thicker then the M Roadster?? Is that true?? Also, can somebody find out about the Ground Control Sways? I read from the OTHER forum that it needs to be modified to fit our cars??? |
Appreciate
0
|
05-26-2009, 01:44 PM | #15 |
Captain
55
Rep 815
Posts |
The rear bars are not at all interchangeable (shaped to fit around different differentials). The fronts aren't exactly the same, but the M bars are said the be usable on the non-M "with minor modification". I haven't physically examined an M and non-M front bar together, but this info comes from the folks at BMS who have.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|