01-14-2022, 04:49 PM | #1 |
Private
87
Rep 99
Posts |
Baseline Dyno 19 M5 Comp
I was finally able to get my M5 strapped on the dyno to get a baseline run. Couldn't be any happier with the results! I have read over and over again that these are underrated from the factory but damn! Love it!
|
01-15-2022, 08:35 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant Colonel
966
Rep 1,782
Posts |
What does the graph show? What is the difference between the red and blue lines? Aren't dynos relative in that you would use them to compare before and after results?
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2022, 08:44 AM | #4 | |
...
1446
Rep 1,298
Posts |
Quote:
You can compare dyno to dyno I believe. You just need to make sure the correction methods are the same. This one references SAE smoothing. If you see another graph with different numbers for the same car it might be using STD smoothing or for some reason be displayed uncorrected. This is the limits of my dyno knowledge though. 😀
__________________
Current: 2022 M5 CS
Past: 2021 M550i (BSM) Past: 2010 535 xDrive (Alpine White) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2022, 10:01 AM | #6 |
Lieutenant General
5179
Rep 10,557
Posts |
Smoothing is not SAE or STD; it simply reduces the little peaks and valleys in the graph so it is smoother and easier to read at any point. SAE and STD are measurement corrections to specified temp/air density. STD reads roughly 2.5% higher. Uncorrected is what you actually made — which might be higher on a cold day with dense air and less on a hot and humid day.
Dyno results also vary among brands so comparing results from one brand to another does not always work. The OP simply ran twice on the Dynojet. Each run is close to the other but not identical. This is typical. The OP did not specify octane, but the results are strong for a stock car so my guess is 93. If he ran 93 mixed with ethanol for E30, the results are probably slightly better than on just 93 even with no tune. Likewise 91 results would likely be slightly lower. The gear you run in can also have a slight effect due to how gearing loads the engine. And running in AWD might slightly change results due to increased drivetrain loss over running in RWD, though I am not sure you could run in RWD without traction issues. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2022, 05:56 PM | #8 |
Lieutenant
377
Rep 541
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-15-2022, 06:24 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant General
5179
Rep 10,557
Posts |
Some dyno graphs from other dyno companies are “corrected” to crank hp, but I am not sure how they come up with the additive. Dynojet does not have that feature as far as I know.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2022, 11:50 AM | #13 | |
First Lieutenant
87
Rep 315
Posts |
Quote:
but I got 91 and e20 in it with dinan turbo inlets and bmc filters probably my best guess would be like 590 wheel
__________________
2020 BMW m5 with some bmc filters, charcoal filter delete, and Dinan turbo inlets.
Previous BMW model 2018 bmw 340i FBO custom e50 tune 500 wheel |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|