11-02-2012, 04:02 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
330d: Compared To What Engine?
There is no doubting the 330d is a fantastic car, but we seem to be comparing it in road tests to the 328i. Why?
If we were in the 5-series we would compare a 530d (with the same engine as our 330d) to the 535i, both on price point (within £200 with same gearbox) and on them both being 6-cylinder turbo engines with similar performance. In the 1-series we would compare the 125d and 125i, both for similar price, 'same' performance and also both being 4-cylinder turbo engines. Somehow in the 3-series we seem to be in a different place, messed by BMW pricing and also for a reason I don't know, comparing a 4-cylinder 2.0 litre petrol with a 6-cylinder 3.0 litre diesel engine. I know the 3-series price point is out of phase for the 335i and 330d, which must be marketing, as in the 5-series they can price match. But shouldn't we really be comparing engine performance on a more level playing field? Looking more at the 3.0 litre turbo engines, seeing as both are state of the art designs from BMW? Certainly I don't compare the 328i and 330d, if anything I'd compare the N20 2.0i turbo engine more towards the N47S 2.0d engine, as used in the 125d and 525d models. I know buying or running one, or the other, is a different issue, but for performance let's compare like for like, not apples and pears. IMO, it says something for the 328i engine, if we feel we can even compare it along side the 330d. I know some compare the 328i to the 320d, perhaps they are seeing it for what it really is. HighlandPete |
11-02-2012, 04:21 AM | #2 |
Brigadier General
349
Rep 3,022
Posts |
I think the 328i is actually one of the stars of the range...and its 5.5k cheaper than the 330d
So yep agree, not an easier comparable for the 30d but the 335i is closer in price
__________________
M2 Arrived!
Family 5er |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 05:37 AM | #3 |
Lieutenant General
3533
Rep 11,292
Posts |
Maybe its just because of history Pete.
With the E9X range the 335i was ALWAYS compared to the 335d and NOT the 330d. Maybe old habits die hard so people still are not comparing the 330d to the 335i. Also in the past the 330d was compared to the 330i - now the 330i is replaced by the 328i. Its just the 330d has moved on with performance and the 330i/328i hasn't (no point really as we have a 335i!). The 330d is more closely matched bhp-wise to the 328i (245 vs 258) only 13 bhp difference whereas the 335i is like 50 bhp more. Although I realise the 330d has a shed load more torque than both. Price-wise the 330d is around £2K more when you put the same 'box on the 328i, so not a vast amount more in cost. The 335i is about £3K more than the 330d with the same 'box. Last edited by dopper99; 11-02-2012 at 06:28 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 05:44 AM | #4 |
Brigadier General
2812
Rep 4,936
Posts
Drives: 340i MPPSK
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sussex, N.Yorks, UK
|
At the price point I was looking at of around £30K before plundering BMW's expensive options list, the 320d and the 328i were within £1K of each other and that was what I was comparing.
However, BMW closed the gap between the 328i and the 330d by making the 8spd Sport Auto box standard spec on the diesel while it's a £1,660 option on the petrol car. The result is that reduces the difference on a strictly like for like basis to just £2,500 between the 328i/330d which I guess is why they are seen as comparable (cost-wise at least).
__________________
Life is a state of mind |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 06:17 AM | #5 | |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
For me, if running costs were no object, you would immediately set your sights on 335i. As for most of us running costs are an issue, which puts the 335i out of the running. So the question is: Do I spend a few grand less and buy a 328i? or spend a bit more up front and buy the more economical 330D? Well that was my thinking anyways, so would see them as a fair comparison. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 07:47 AM | #6 |
Major
25
Rep 1,197
Posts |
I think the disappearance of a 320i has clouded some people's judgement. It's a sign of the times that a 250bhp turbocharged 4-pot is now the entry level 3 series
__________________
"Sleeper 335D xDrive M Sport" Glacier Silver / Black
ZMS | ZNP | ZVI | 2VF | 2VL | 3AG | 494 | 6NS | 8TH |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 07:52 AM | #7 |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 07:55 AM | #8 |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
I also think the BMW numbering has confused many, should it be a 328i? Why not 325i as 25i is used in the 1-series. Same is applying to many of the models, why a 640d and not a 635d, when you have a 535d?
The other factor I see in comparisons, we tend to look at HP, rather than performance. It used to be more simple, but since the diesel has come of age, HP, Nm and revs make for a different sort of mix. Power curves may be very different for a pertol and diesel, but getting to 100mph may be near identical. Torque is not some 'miracle' power maker in isolation, no more than HP is. We still need to look at the 0 - 60, 0 -100 dash as that does give us a feel for performance, even if in-gear increments are often used to discern driveability. Just been looking at the 5-series saloon, as an example, of two different petrol engine designs. The 528i with the 2.0 turbo and the 530i with the 3.0 NA engine. I know the engine output isn't the whole picture, as engine weight and gearing have a part to play as well, but note the 528i is the faster car on paper. Wonder what the feel of the delivery is like in each model and which feels more muscular? 528i Top speed (mph) 155 (155) Acceleration 0-62 mph (sec) 6.2 (6.3) Acceleration 50-75 mph in 4th (sec) 6.2 Max output (kW/hp/rpm) 180 / 245 / 5000-6000 Max torque (Nm/rpm) 350 / 1250-4500 530i Top speed (mph) 155 (155) Acceleration 0-62 mph (sec) 6.5 (6.6) Acceleration 50-75 mph in 4th (sec) 7.0 Max output (kW/hp/rpm) 200/272/6100 Max torque (Nm/rpm) 310/1600-4250 HighlandPete |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 08:20 AM | #9 |
Major
25
Rep 1,197
Posts |
Really? I've seen or heard nothing about it and don't remember seeing it on the configurator Doesn't mean I'm right by any means but I figured the 320D/328i were entry level Wotanoob.
__________________
"Sleeper 335D xDrive M Sport" Glacier Silver / Black
ZMS | ZNP | ZVI | 2VF | 2VL | 3AG | 494 | 6NS | 8TH |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 09:18 AM | #10 |
Brigadier General
2812
Rep 4,936
Posts
Drives: 340i MPPSK
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sussex, N.Yorks, UK
|
In fact the 320i has been joined by a 316i now, and according to the configurator that's a genuine 1600cc engine, not just funny BMW numbering.
BTW, the 328i is the entry level model in the US, but then all they have in the F30 range is the 328i & 335i. Reckon if they had the 330d they'd be impressed.
__________________
Life is a state of mind Last edited by RobUK; 11-02-2012 at 09:24 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 09:41 AM | #11 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
They are more into the F30 ActiveHybrid 3. I've read that BMW are not yet committed to when F30 variants in the USA will have diesel power. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-02-2012, 10:07 AM | #12 | |
Major General
3489
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2012, 02:32 PM | #13 |
Banned
2010
Rep 6,065
Posts |
I think the comparison is more performance rather than price. 328i very similar performance to 330d, 320i very similar performance to 320d and so on. The 328i badge has some historical significance for BMW.
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2012, 03:04 PM | #14 |
Major
25
Rep 1,197
Posts |
335i is much more similar to the 330D in performance A 330D would leave the 328 for dead from any speed in any gear. It'd leave a 335i for dead at most speeds in most gears
__________________
"Sleeper 335D xDrive M Sport" Glacier Silver / Black
ZMS | ZNP | ZVI | 2VF | 2VL | 3AG | 494 | 6NS | 8TH |
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2012, 05:00 PM | #15 | |
Lieutenant General
3533
Rep 11,292
Posts |
Quote:
If one had 100bhp more than the other then I'd expect it to leave it for dead in that case. The F30 330d is no doubt a quick car, but watch this - just to put things back into perspective. Last edited by dopper99; 11-07-2012 at 05:15 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2012, 05:15 PM | #16 |
Lieutenant General
3533
Rep 11,292
Posts |
BTW, this is what I'd call being left for dead :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHrsw...ure=plcp#t=13s |
Appreciate
0
|
11-07-2012, 05:56 PM | #17 |
Brigadier General
2812
Rep 4,936
Posts
Drives: 340i MPPSK
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sussex, N.Yorks, UK
|
330d has a lower 0-60 time plus more torque, 328i is perhaps more 'nimble'. Interesting article on how pure figures are misleading though.
http://www.houseofthud.com/cartech/zero2sixty.htm For me the close competitors are 335i (3.0L, 0-60 in 5.5s) vs. 330d (3.0L, 0-60 in 5.6s) and 320i (2.0L, 0-60 in 7.6s) vs 320d (2.0L, 0-60 in 7.6s). If there was a 'hot' version of the 320d, say a 323d that might be a more natural comparison with the 328i? Anyway, I say we enjoy our respective cars and hit on the Merc's and Audi's instead
__________________
Life is a state of mind Last edited by RobUK; 11-07-2012 at 06:18 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2012, 02:43 AM | #18 |
Major
25
Rep 1,197
Posts |
0-60 is the least interesting time. 20-40, 40-60, 40-100, 60-90, 50-70 ... these are all real times and the 330D would ... leave the 328i for dead ... at any of those measures in any gear As I said before, other than on full reheat at 5000rpm+, the 330D would beat the 335i at any of those measures BHP is all talk but torque is fo' real
The world has changed ... and for the better. Modern diesels are better in almost every way compared to their petrol counterparts Do they sounds as good? Certainly not when a petrol is on cam. Do they make the back of your neck tingle? Nope. Are they as quick on full afterburner? Rarely. But in every other way they're the superior engine And mine arrives at he dealer on Monday
__________________
"Sleeper 335D xDrive M Sport" Glacier Silver / Black
ZMS | ZNP | ZVI | 2VF | 2VL | 3AG | 494 | 6NS | 8TH |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2012, 03:56 AM | #19 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
What has changed the drive feel IMO, is our more common use of auto boxes. If we plant the loud pedal in full auto, each engine will be more likely in the power band for the particular engine, differences get more blurred than ever. It is not like in a manual box, where 'in-gear' times are so much more noticed and pronounced. Particularly if we are not in the best gear. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2012, 05:55 AM | #20 |
Live for today tomorrow never comes
1989
Rep 9,498
Posts |
Yep agreed.
__________________
Live for now, life is too short.
2021 LCI M5 Marina Bay Blue/ Smoked White Leather |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2012, 06:23 AM | #21 |
Brigadier General
2812
Rep 4,936
Posts
Drives: 340i MPPSK
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Sussex, N.Yorks, UK
|
Remember tho, it's the driver not the engine that determines how fast a car goes I've a mate with an AstraMax van who'll beat pretty much anything on 4 wheels - (he's a complete yob!)
__________________
Life is a state of mind |
Appreciate
0
|
11-08-2012, 09:54 AM | #22 | |
Lieutenant General
6659
Rep 15,858
Posts |
Quote:
If you were to boot either in auto form, the performance would be virtually identical, just one would see a few more revs. Using the 530d vs 535i as a comparison, the petrol is about 0.8 sec faster in the standing kilometre. Can imagine the 330d vs 335i would be similar. However we break up the increments, in-gears, etc., through the gears there's nothing in it, when both are stretched. HighlandPete |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|