Update gintani stupid tune

junshen97 · 09-30-2021, 06:41 PM

The toque is drop fast. Is it Turbo's problem or the tune's problem? Does anyone know?

Kponti · 09-30-2021, 07:38 PM

What is your before? I see 542/549/558 RWHP, is any of that a before or are all these after dynos?

junshen97 · 09-30-2021, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kponti

What is your before? I see 542/549/558 RWHP, is any of that a before or are all these after dynos?

No this is after stage2 tune in dyno

PaLaKaT · 09-30-2021, 10:34 PM

Just get your money back and get Bootmod3 and dont ever look back. Dragy numbers dont lie.

junshen97 · 09-30-2021, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DB_BMW

Just get your money back and get Bootmod3 and dont ever look back. Dragy numbers dont lie.

They don't do money back

GTATX · 09-30-2021, 11:35 PM

This numbers are really bad almost as close to stock. Go with any other reputable companies like Evolve (custom tune utku Noa), HCP, BM3 or DME.

junshen97 · 09-30-2021, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTATX

This numbers are really bad almost as close to stock. Go with any other reputable companies like Evolve (custom tune utku Noa), HCP, BM3 or DME.

Drive it like stock (add burble) stupid tune

Danny D · 10-01-2021, 11:28 AM

The torque dropping from 558 to 549 to 542 - is due to the fact the dyno operator just ran 3 runs back to back with only 5 seconds apart from one another. - Geez let the car cool off a few min in between, LOL.
Not sure of the fan setup - but heat soak will for sure do that.

Also note this is a Mustang dyno, and typically will read about 10-12% lower then a dynojet - so your actually in the ballpark of 620 torque. Not bad I would think.
Do some draggy runs and get some real times to compare with others.
Hope this helps.

junshen97 · 10-01-2021, 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny D

The torque dropping from 558 to 549 to 542 - is due to the fact the dyno operator just ran 3 runs back to back with only 5 seconds apart from one another. - Geez let the car cool off a few min in between, LOL.
Not sure of the fan setup - but heat soak will for sure do that.

Also note this is a Mustang dyno, and typically will read about 10-12% lower then a dynojet - so your actually in the ballpark of 620 torque. Not bad I would think.
Do some draggy runs and get some real times to compare with others.
Hope this helps.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danny D

The torque dropping from 558 to 549 to 542 - is due to the fact the dyno operator just ran 3 runs back to back with only 5 seconds apart from one another. - Geez let the car cool off a few min in between, LOL.
Not sure of the fan setup - but heat soak will for sure do that.

Also note this is a Mustang dyno, and typically will read about 10-12% lower then a dynojet - so your actually in the ballpark of 620 torque. Not bad I would think.
Do some draggy runs and get some real times to compare with others.
Hope this helps.

Thanks each round 5 minutes

eric97hoh · 10-01-2021, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTATX

This numbers are really bad almost as close to stock. Go with any other reputable companies like Evolve (custom tune utku Noa), HCP, BM3 or DME.

for the love of christ delete that gitani tune lmao and do what this guy said above

FSociety · 10-04-2021, 07:25 PM

junshen97 i told u via FB messenger u should do a stock (baseline) dyno too. If you plan to use that dyno again go there, if not try to find an AWD Dynojet

Matt TTP · 10-09-2021, 07:10 AM

Did you base line this car on this dyno ? Your dragy data from your other post shows the mph change from the tune over 5 mph [ with the da going from 700 to 1400 ft ] in the 1/4 that is about 80 wheel over stock . As everyone has pointed out the 91 octane is your limiting factor . Not the tune . I don't care who's tune you run they will all be limited based on the Octane . There is no magic potion [ key strokes] when you are fuel limited . There will just be broken parts . Trust me I have been tuning domestic cars for over 15yrs . Have my own Mustang awd dyno and a 20 M8GC the I am working with Alex on .

09-30-2021, 06:41 PM	#1
junshen97 New Member 2 Rep 22 Posts Drives: bmw m5 Join Date: Sep 2021 Location: losangeles iTrader: (0)	Update gintani stupid tune The toque is drop fast. Is it Turbo's problem or the tune's problem? Does anyone know? Attached Images
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

09-30-2021, 07:38 PM	#2
Kponti Second Lieutenant 114 Rep 282 Posts Drives: 2023 M8C comp Join Date: Sep 2020 Location: Houston iTrader: (0)	What is your before? I see 542/549/558 RWHP, is any of that a before or are all these after dynos?
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-30-2021, 10:34 PM	#4
PaLaKaT Private First Class 71 Rep 185 Posts Drives: 2022 X6M Join Date: Oct 2013 Location: New Jersey iTrader: (0) Garage List 2019 BMW M5 Competi ... [0.00] 2019 BMW 740i xDrive [0.00]	Just get your money back and get Bootmod3 and dont ever look back. Dragy numbers dont lie.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

09-30-2021, 11:35 PM	#6
GTATX Lieutenant Colonel 1105 Rep 1,607 Posts Drives: 2020 M8 Comp First Edition Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Georgetown TX iTrader: (0) Garage List 2020 BMW M8 Comp GC ... [9.00]	This numbers are really bad almost as close to stock. Go with any other reputable companies like Evolve (custom tune utku Noa), HCP, BM3 or DME. __________________ GT 2020 BMW M8 Comp First Edition 2019 Panamera Turbo 2021 BMW X6M Comp 2019 BMW M5 2018 Maserati Ghibli SQ4 GranSport
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-01-2021, 11:28 AM	#8
Danny D Second Lieutenant 228 Rep 298 Posts Drives: M5 Join Date: May 2021 Location: Toronto iTrader: (0)	The torque dropping from 558 to 549 to 542 - is due to the fact the dyno operator just ran 3 runs back to back with only 5 seconds apart from one another. - Geez let the car cool off a few min in between, LOL. Not sure of the fan setup - but heat soak will for sure do that. Also note this is a Mustang dyno, and typically will read about 10-12% lower then a dynojet - so your actually in the ballpark of 620 torque. Not bad I would think. Do some draggy runs and get some real times to compare with others. Hope this helps.
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-04-2021, 07:25 PM	#11
FSociety IG @bmwF9xG80 3813 Rep 7,593 Posts Drives: G80 M3, X4M, G07 X7m50 Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: NYC to NJ to Orlando FL iTrader: (3) Garage List 2023 BMW G80 M3 [0.00] 2020 BMW X4MC [0.00] 16' BMW X4 M40i [10.00] 06 Cadillac STS [0.00]	junshen97 i told u via FB messenger u should do a stock (baseline) dyno too. If you plan to use that dyno again go there, if not try to find an AWD Dynojet __________________ 60-130mph 6.5s X4M #HCP 60-130mph 5.0s G80 M3 #OrlandoAutowerks Sauce IG: @bmwF9XG80
	Appreciate 0 Quote

10-09-2021, 07:10 AM	#12
Matt TTP Registered 0 Rep 3 Posts Drives: 2020 M8 Gran Coupe Join Date: Oct 2020 Location: NJ iTrader: (0)	Did you base line this car on this dyno ? Your dragy data from your other post shows the mph change from the tune over 5 mph [ with the da going from 700 to 1400 ft ] in the 1/4 that is about 80 wheel over stock . As everyone has pointed out the 91 octane is your limiting factor . Not the tune . I don't care who's tune you run they will all be limited based on the Octane . There is no magic potion [ key strokes] when you are fuel limited . There will just be broken parts . Trust me I have been tuning domestic cars for over 15yrs . Have my own Mustang awd dyno and a 20 M8GC the I am working with Alex on .
	Appreciate 0 Quote