M5 CS vs 991 Turbo S

No Boost · 04-27-2021, 03:20 PM

Car has some serious pull as compared to the old (but still fast AF) Turbo S

Simon H · 04-28-2021, 02:57 AM

Without searching, how does this compare to the 992 Turbo S ?.

Just found it 5.6 secs for comparison, so 0.9 slower than the latest and greatest ?.

No Boost · 04-28-2021, 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon H

Without searching, how does this compare to the 992 Turbo S ?.

Just found it 5.6 secs for comparison, so 0.9 slower than the latest and greatest ?.

Yeah, the 992 S has a 5.7 lb/hp ratio and hence, is in a different stratosphere.

RaTeD ///M · 05-05-2021, 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by No Boost

Yeah, the 992 S has a 5.7 lb/hp ratio and hence, is in a different stratosphere.

At first glance I thought the post read faster than 911 turbo S. Then I scrolled down and noticed it was 991 turbo s.

TrevorM3 · 05-05-2021, 09:14 PM

anyone know the song at :27? lol

so this car is faster than the old turbo s, not the new one.. is that correct? i dont know any of the p car lingo.. 991, 911, etc..

onfireX5 · 05-05-2021, 09:29 PM

My 2019 Turbo S........

Simon H · 05-06-2021, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onfireX5

My 2019 Turbo S........

Is this a standard car ?.

onfireX5 · 05-06-2021, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon H

Is this a standard car ?.

Pump gas 93 octane. High flow catalytic converters. Tune. Very basic.

Simon H · 05-06-2021, 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onfireX5

Pump gas 93 octane. High flow catalytic converters. Tune. Very basic.

So not standard then ?.

Quinn A · 05-06-2021, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon H

So not standard then ?.

There was a guy on here before talking about how his stock 991 turbo ran 9s.

It was upgraded turbo internals, cat delete, meth, Y pipe, and tune but other then that BONE STOCK!

Not sure why some people compare modded cars to stock ones.

TrevorM3 · 05-06-2021, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quinn A

There was a guy on here before talking about how his stock 991 turbo ran 9s.

It was upgraded turbo internals, cat delete, meth, Y pipe, and tune but other then that BONE STOCK!

Not sure why some people compare modded cars to stock ones.

what an idiot

Simon H · 05-07-2021, 06:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quinn A

There was a guy on here before talking about how his stock 991 turbo ran 9s.

It was upgraded turbo internals, cat delete, meth, Y pipe, and tune but other then that BONE STOCK!

Not sure why some people compare modded cars to stock ones.

Yes, i dont understand why folks would compare modded to standard. Oh yes, its standard, apart from the exhaust, and a tune, oh really ??.

AHall · 05-07-2021, 07:31 AM

Why compare a four door sedan to a turbo s? Why not a McLaren 720s or Ferrari 812?

TrevorM3 · 05-07-2021, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AHall

Why compare a four door sedan to a turbo s? Why not a McLaren 720s or Ferrari 812?

haha, dont mean to start this debate.. but...

turbo s isn't an exotic. fight me.

onfireX5 · 05-07-2021, 08:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon H

Yes, i dont understand why folks would compare modded to standard. Oh yes, its standard, apart from the exhaust, and a tune, oh really ??.

Really. But if you are fixated on “standard”....my standard untouched F90 with BMW air in the tires and “as arrived” BMW petrol in the petrol tank was 0.8 seconds slower than my 911 with Porsche air in the tires and Porsche petrol in the tank as both were delivered off the boat. Dealership did clean both cars before testing for full disclosure.

After a stage 1 tune on the F90 on pump fuel it was still 0.40 slower.

After a stage 1 tune on the 911, there was no reason to keep comparing the two for obvious reasons. Both excellent at what they do.

onfireX5 · 05-07-2021, 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TrevorM3

haha, dont mean to start this debate.. but...

turbo s isn't an exotic. fight me.

Totally agree.

Anything below Koenigsegg , is just a car when it comes to exotic craftsmanship. Some cost more, some are quicker, some are reliable, some “look” cut, some don’t.....but they are all just basic transportation with exotic aspirations.

Simon H · 05-08-2021, 05:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onfireX5

Really. But if you are fixated on “standard”....my standard untouched F90 with BMW air in the tires and “as arrived” BMW petrol in the petrol tank was 0.8 seconds slower than my 911 with Porsche air in the tires and Porsche petrol in the tank as both were delivered off the boat. Dealership did clean both cars before testing for full disclosure.

After a stage 1 tune on the F90 on pump fuel it was still 0.40 slower.

After a stage 1 tune on the 911, there was no reason to keep comparing the two for obvious reasons. Both excellent at what they do.

If you remap the car, and change the exhaust, you have changed the standard from BMW/Porsche parameters. The M5 CS is how it came from BMW, apart from the petrol, he has put in it. ?

onfireX5 · 05-08-2021, 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon H

If you remap the car, and change the exhaust, you have changed the standard from BMW/Porsche parameters. The M5 CS is how it came from BMW, apart from the petrol, he has put in it. ?

That is why I posted the standard numbers for the 911 and F90, before remap and changes, for reference. Totally understand some do not make changes. I have a F97 that is bone stock, untouched from the factory. Leave some alone, remap others.

Simon H · 05-08-2021, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onfireX5

That is why I posted the standard numbers for the 911 and F90, before remap and changes, for reference. Totally understand some do not make changes. I have a F97 that is bone stock, untouched from the factory. Leave some alone, remap others.

If im honest, if it wasnt for the warranty implications, for the first 3 years, i would have mine remapped, just to know, its running at optimum levels, and not compromised by the factory having to use settings that are governed by these rules and those rules

.

onfireX5 · 05-08-2021, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simon H

If im honest, if it wasnt for the warranty implications, for the first 3 years, i would have mine remapped, just to know, its running at optimum levels, and not compromised by the factory having to use settings that are governed by these rules and those rules

.

Totally understand and do the same on some.

ScullyD · 05-13-2021, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AHall

Why compare a four door sedan to a turbo s? Why not a McLaren 720s or Ferrari 812?

I'm starting to believe, this is BMW's take on a BMW supercar. The top gear review was strong, the ads had flashes of it over an M1.

Wouldn't a BMW supercar be a sedan?

TrevorM3 · 05-13-2021, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ScullyD

I'm starting to believe, this is BMW's take on a BMW supercar. The top gear review was strong, the ads had flashes of it over an M1.

Wouldn't a BMW supercar be a sedan?

no no and no.

a supercar is a supercar, end of story.

04-27-2021, 03:20 PM	#1
No Boost enthusiasm > practicality 4021 Rep 2,247 Posts Drives: 987 CS \| G35x Join Date: Oct 2016 Location: Chester County, PA iTrader: (0) Garage List 2007 987.1 Cayman S [10.00] 2008 Infiniti G35x ... [0.00]	M5 CS vs 991 Turbo S Car has some serious pull as compared to the old (but still fast AF) Turbo S __________________ FSI 3.8L Stg II\|6MT\|SOUL\|IPD+GT3 TB\|Numeric Racing\|KW\|Tarett\|Rennline\|Raceseng\|APEX\|Recaro\|7.3 lb/hp VQ35HR\|5AT\|Stillen\|FI\|UpRev tune 8k rpm\|TransGo\|Hotchkis\|Whiteline\|H&R\|Z1\|Corbeau\|R1 Concepts\|10 lb/hp Left lane campers, GTFO!
	Appreciate 0 Tweet Quote

04-28-2021, 02:57 AM	#2
Simon H Major 875 Rep 1,319 Posts Drives: M5 Competition Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: UK iTrader: (0)	Without searching, how does this compare to the 992 Turbo S ?. Just found it 5.6 secs for comparison, so 0.9 slower than the latest and greatest ?. Last edited by Simon H; 04-28-2021 at 03:08 AM..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-05-2021, 09:14 PM	#5
TrevorM3 Banned 3322 Rep 8,083 Posts Drives: 6.3 AMG Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Florida iTrader: (0)	anyone know the song at :27? lol so this car is faster than the old turbo s, not the new one.. is that correct? i dont know any of the p car lingo.. 991, 911, etc..
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-05-2021, 09:29 PM	#6
onfireX5 Brigadier General 3618 Rep 4,532 Posts Drives: F90M5,F85X5M Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: Va iTrader: (0)	My 2019 Turbo S........ Attached Images
	Appreciate 0 Quote

05-07-2021, 07:31 AM	#13
AHall Lieutenant Colonel 974 Rep 1,795 Posts Drives: 1993 Nissan 240sx Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Frisco, Texas iTrader: (0)	Why compare a four door sedan to a turbo s? Why not a McLaren 720s or Ferrari 812?
	Appreciate 0 Quote