04-15-2019, 10:49 PM | #1 |
Brigadier General
10968
Rep 3,759
Posts |
A question for you fellows that track your F90s. (4WD/2WD?)
What do you prefer on the track? I'm sure 2WD is more fun but have you folks tried both with their respective racing lines and compared lap times? I'm going to assume 4WD will still lap faster but I've got no experience here yet so I'd love to hear from you.
|
04-16-2019, 11:38 AM | #4 |
Lieutenant
153
Rep 427
Posts
Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
|
I haven't tracked it yet, but will probably do 4WD Sport. I ran my M6 on the track and while the loose rear end was fun, it was pretty easy to swing it too wide and lose a lot of time (with a giant smile).
I was unlucky and got the Pirellis instead of the Michelins, so my plan is to drive them hard and burn them up and then go with slightly wider Michelin 4S probably. (although I really would love to 305 or bigger in the rear which then pushes new rims, and still leaves me with issues finding good upsizing that keeps the rolling diameters < 1.4% (or whatever) of stock... I think the R888Rs would be great, but I don't know why you wouldn't go 285 F and 295R? It's meant to be a rear biased car (and 4WD Sport delivers) so wider in the back I think would let you put down more power faster coming out of turns, etc.... |
Appreciate
1
NYG10967.50 |
04-16-2019, 10:31 PM | #6 |
First Lieutenant
317
Rep 343
Posts
Drives: '19 750i xDrive
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Illinois
|
At Thermal (BMW Performance Center West) they recommended 4WD with DSC fully on for the non-comp F90. Whereas for the M3/M4 the recommendation was MDM.
The non-comp F90's recommended driving settings were sport plus for both engine and suspension, and comfort for steering. For the M3/M4 it was sport for engine, sport plus for suspension, and comfort for steering. |
Appreciate
1
NYG10967.50 |
04-17-2019, 01:55 PM | #8 | |
Lieutenant
153
Rep 427
Posts
Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2019, 09:05 PM | #9 | |
Brigadier General
10968
Rep 3,759
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2019, 11:19 AM | #10 | |
Lieutenant
153
Rep 427
Posts
Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
|
Quote:
Is there a source manual or TSB or something about DSC off = comfort steering? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2019, 01:21 AM | #11 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1033
Rep 1,997
Posts |
Glad to see some that some folks are tracking this car. I took my M6GC around buttonwillow... it was fairly quick but I felt very isolated in it compared to most other cars I've tracked (F80 M3s, 718S, Camaros, e46 M3...) ... I think the overall size is what kinda killed it for me.
I think if I get an M5C I'll definitely try it in both modes ... haven't driven a far AWD car in a while and I'm sure it's pretty impressive digging out of a corner.
__________________
Gone but not forgotten: '09 STi // '08 335i // '02 M3 // '11 335i // '15 M3 // '16 M3 // '16 Camaro SS // '16 Audi S3 // '18 Boxster 718S // '17 Camaro SS 1LE // '16 M6 GC CP
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2019, 01:22 AM | #12 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1033
Rep 1,997
Posts |
Were u wanting a square setup just for tire longevity and rotating them front to back or for handling purposes?
__________________
Gone but not forgotten: '09 STi // '08 335i // '02 M3 // '11 335i // '15 M3 // '16 M3 // '16 Camaro SS // '16 Audi S3 // '18 Boxster 718S // '17 Camaro SS 1LE // '16 M6 GC CP
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2019, 05:42 AM | #13 |
Enlisted Member
15
Rep 33
Posts |
Not for longevity, not for rotating ... For track purposes, the better R compound track tire sizes are limited so need to switch slightly from stock. So trying to find best option while utilizing stock wheels. Need to take into consideration different size stock Front and Rear wheel width and keep overall diameter very close ...
Last edited by Kstadt911; 04-19-2019 at 11:54 AM.. |
Appreciate
1
evanescent031033.00 |
04-19-2019, 06:12 AM | #14 | |
Captain
184
Rep 764
Posts |
Quote:
Be careful about sizing guys. Need to maintain overall diameter within 2% front to rear due to AWD. (might even be 1%, I'm not exactly sure) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2019, 12:43 PM | #15 |
Lieutenant
153
Rep 427
Posts
Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
|
I'm going to try to burn through my Pirellis and then find some size setup I like of the 4Ss... I really want 305 or wider on the rear but that seems to be tricky with maintaining F/R diameters.
I tracked my old F13 M6 (not the GC though). While certainly bigger and heavier than my E92 M3, I found it to be surprisingly fun on the track, better in the corners than I expected, and powerful enough to chase down pretty much anyone on the straights. Just had to setup nice early apex turns and try to not let the rear get too loose.. |
Appreciate
1
Bönz183.50 |
04-19-2019, 03:26 PM | #16 | |
Brigadier General
4429
Rep 4,109
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2019, 10:03 PM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
10968
Rep 3,759
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2019, 10:04 AM | #18 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
752
Rep 1,857
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
1
NYG10967.50 |
04-20-2019, 10:44 AM | #19 | |
Lieutenant
153
Rep 427
Posts
Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
|
Quote:
From googling I’m not able to get a clear picture. I saw one post where the rationale for putting steering in Comfort for the track was to keep the PS from overheating (which makes little sense to me). And there’s tons of (often conflicting) info for other M-cars, but that don’t have the same set of settings that our cars have. On the street I feel like Comfort steering is way too light for me I can’t imagine tracking it like that. I guess I need to spend some time on the track and try everything |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2019, 10:49 AM | #20 |
Lieutenant
153
Rep 427
Posts
Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
|
This thread makes it seem like Comfort steering is only due to high temperatures in CA - https://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sh....php?t=1383918
And even then there’s folks pointing out that based on the manual that doesn’t actually make any sense. *shrug*. I can understand if you prefer a lighter feel, but again, for me, Comfort feels too light even for daily driving. |
Appreciate
1
NYG10967.50 |
04-20-2019, 08:34 PM | #21 | |
Brigadier General
10968
Rep 3,759
Posts |
Quote:
I prefer sport steering. |
|
Appreciate
1
devondragon153.00 |
04-20-2019, 08:49 PM | #22 |
Brigadier General
4429
Rep 4,109
Posts |
I often find myself in the minority but, in this case, I also prefer the Comfort setting. It's all just artificial weight... and I can feel that every time I turn the wheel. There's no additional feedback... because there's no mechanical feedback to speak of to begin with.
I get the fact that at high speed, the resistance can prevent unintended input but I haven't found that to be a problem in Comfort mode. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|