03-29-2018, 03:54 PM | #23 |
Captain
161
Rep 763
Posts |
Oh the F90 M5 is definitely super impressive, sorry if my post didn't convey that, I just thought the 60-130 time would be faster is all. It's just one metric for measurement anyways so it's not a big deal, it's all just fun discussing these insane cars; thank you for providing these test results.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2018, 03:56 PM | #24 | |
Major
967
Rep 1,080
Posts |
Quote:
A stock C6Z traps anywhere between 122-125 MPH on average. It is capable with solid/impressive DA to get higher numbers. The C7Z is between 125-128 MPH on average. I am happy you are providing the info and we welcome it - that said I do not believe the low to mid 8 second 60-130 pulls are equal for a 127-129 MPH car. Many builds ago, my car was trapping the same numbers as the F90 and ran mid to high 7's 60-130. Different car granted - with a different number of gears and different gearing - but the same/near same 1/4 ET and 0-60 MPH numbers of the F90 (which shows you just how quick and fast this generation of luxury GT cars have come lol)... When I get mine - I will of course tell all of these numbers - and road surface/temps/DA will also determine changes to the final results. That said, I am sticking with my at least high 7 second 60-130 prediction lol. Appreciate the efforts! |
|
Appreciate
1
fusionchicken161.00 |
03-29-2018, 04:05 PM | #26 |
Major
967
Rep 1,080
Posts |
Thank-you for this...yes - break in, temps, DA, road surface - many variables. Looking forward to more testing as the cars come on the road!
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2018, 04:06 PM | #27 | ||
374
Rep 1,374
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Gaining momentum in 3300lbs is far easier than in a car weighing 800 more pounds. Gearing is also relevant, as you mentioned. For reference our W213 E63s ran 8.6 bone stock. Low 8's are stout for something of this size, but what do I know |
||
Appreciate
4
|
03-29-2018, 04:08 PM | #28 | |
Major
967
Rep 1,080
Posts |
Quote:
But still hopeful! |
|
Appreciate
1
Lalit@autocouture373.50 |
03-29-2018, 04:08 PM | #29 |
Captain
161
Rep 763
Posts |
Yep 60-130 is just one metric, as mentioned I expect to get walked IRL, with even reaction time etc
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2018, 04:09 PM | #30 | |
374
Rep 1,374
Posts |
Quote:
It will most certainly run mid 7's stock...down a mountain |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2018, 04:22 PM | #31 |
Captain
161
Rep 763
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2018, 09:24 PM | #33 |
Lieutenant General
4971
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Who replies with all the pics from the OP?
To the OP - hot car, looking very nice.
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-29-2018, 09:25 PM | #34 |
Lieutenant General
4971
Rep 10,200
Posts
Drives: 2024 Golf R / 2022 718 Spyder
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
|
Except...it will eat any car you've got for lunch.
Same with mine...this car is a beast.
__________________
Past rides: 2016 981 BGTS, 2020 MINI JCW, 2017 F80, 2015 981 CS, 2014 F22 235, 2011 E82 135, 2008 E82 135, 2007 E92 328, 2007 E92 328 (My lady drives an OG M2. So does my dad)
|
Appreciate
1
vtknight966.50 |
03-29-2018, 10:28 PM | #35 | |
Major
967
Rep 1,080
Posts |
Quote:
OP made a good point about weight - these cars are heavy and although from the dyno results there is a goodly amount of power, getting that heft to provide a solid 60-130 is tricky. Trap speed is the potential of the car - and again for a four door luxury GT car - 127-129 MPH is a goodly amount of potential. Great time to be a car enthusiast! |
|
Appreciate
1
MTHX233.00 |
03-30-2018, 12:17 AM | #37 |
Lieutenant Colonel
750
Rep 1,857
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2018, 01:57 AM | #38 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1062
Rep 1,876
Posts |
Satin black always hits the spot!
__________________
Mine: BSM F30 335i M Sport
Hers: AW F30 328i M Sport |
Appreciate
1
Lalit@autocouture373.50 |
03-30-2018, 07:30 AM | #39 |
Banned
705
Rep 1,908
Posts |
|
Appreciate
1
Lalit@autocouture373.50 |
03-30-2018, 08:19 AM | #40 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1604
Rep 1,604
Posts |
Honestly, who cares about a C6 Z06?
__________________
"Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance."
|
Appreciate
1
MilehighM3909.50 |
03-30-2018, 08:27 AM | #41 |
Lieutenant Colonel
750
Rep 1,857
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2018, 08:47 AM | #42 | |
Banned
705
Rep 1,908
Posts |
Quote:
And it’s “mileage” not “milage”, YFI |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-30-2018, 10:31 AM | #43 |
Private
34
Rep 61
Posts |
Based on the 60-130 of this M5 relative to that of the C6 Z06 and based on the video from the other thread of the E63 S destroying the M5, there’s no way in hell this is a 127-129 MPH trap car, more like 121-123 MPH and that WHP reading is probably coming from a very optimistically calibrated dyno.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|