[Lalit@autocouture]

     Featured on BIMMERPOST.com

Wrapped in satin black by NDvinyls/ONEighty.

Edit! Video is up:

Sixth gear is 1:1 and made 587rwhp/568rwtq but hits the speed limiter. Here's our baseline for now, catless numbers to follow shortly.

Fifth gear:
568rwhp/536rwtq
569rwhp/537rwtq



8.30 seconds RWD 60-130
8.57 seconds AWD 60-130





7.13 seconds 100-200KPH



Lusso performance ceramic coated catless downpipes

[Phatcat]

Originally Posted by Lalit@autocouture

Wrapped in satin black by NDvinyls/180 NYC. More pics coming up and car will be getting catless downpipes installed shortly. Here's our stock baseline for now





Sixth gear is 1:1 and made 587rwhp/568rwtq but hits the speed limiter.

Fifth gear:
568rwhp/536rwtq
569rwhp/537rwtq



8.30 seconds RWD 60-130
8.57 seconds AWD 60-130

What's the milage on your car?

[shahin]

Please post link or info of where you buying the catless down pipes from. Thank you

[elitex]

Correct me if I am wrong but that 60-130 time is very impressive.

Also, why not run AWD dyno also?

[MTHX]

For the sake of comparison, here are some 60-130 times for other fast street and production vehicles:

NOTE: Only the below runs with an asterisk (*) next to them have been verified. The accuracy of the other runs can not be guaranteed.

3.9*900+ rwhp Supra, 88mm turbo, 30 psi, TH400 Auto, ET Drags
4.74*996TT 890 rwhp, Divexxtreme 2-shifts
4.9 - 940 rwhp Supra (35 psi)
5.1 - 840 rwhp Supra (30 psi)
5.4 - 1,000 rwhp TT Viper
5.6 - Bugatti Veyron (estimate based off of verified 100 - 200kph time of 4.8)
5.9 - GSXR 1000 with bolt-ons
5.98*C5 Vette with big motor and NOS
6.1 - Saleen S7 Twin Turbo
6.69*Dr. Jitsu / 996 GT2 / 700 crank HP / 1-shift
6.9 - Mosler MT900S
7.0 - Ferrari Enzo
7.24 - Mercedes SLR McLaren
7.3 - Porsche Carrera GT
7.56*C5 Z06TT (APS Turbo, no cats, stock muffler, 573 rwhp @ 9.5 psi) / 1 shift
7.73*997TT with ECU flash / 2 shifts
7.86*Corvette C6 Z06, stock, Divexxtreme / 2 shifts)
8.07*Lamborghini LP640 / 2 shifts
8.86*Stock 997TT / 32 degrees, Tiptronic (0 shifts)
9.10*993 Ruf R Turbo 490 HP / 2 shifts
9.4 - Lamborghini Diablo VT 6.0
9.5 - Ferrari F430
9.6 - Ferrari F50
10.06*996TT with ECU flash / 1 shift
10.9 - Lamborghini Murcielago

Sources:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...0-130-mph.html

[M4LAKA]

What does a bone stock m4 do it in?

[uniqueMR]

Beautiful car,

[ASAP]

Originally Posted by MTHX

For the sake of comparison, here are some 60-130 times for other fast street and production vehicles:

NOTE: Only the below runs with an asterisk (*) next to them have been verified. The accuracy of the other runs can not be guaranteed.

3.9*900+ rwhp Supra, 88mm turbo, 30 psi, TH400 Auto, ET Drags
4.74*996TT 890 rwhp, Divexxtreme 2-shifts
4.9 - 940 rwhp Supra (35 psi)
5.1 - 840 rwhp Supra (30 psi)
5.4 - 1,000 rwhp TT Viper
5.6 - Bugatti Veyron (estimate based off of verified 100 - 200kph time of 4.8)
5.9 - GSXR 1000 with bolt-ons
5.98*C5 Vette with big motor and NOS
6.1 - Saleen S7 Twin Turbo
6.69*Dr. Jitsu / 996 GT2 / 700 crank HP / 1-shift
6.9 - Mosler MT900S
7.0 - Ferrari Enzo
7.24 - Mercedes SLR McLaren
7.3 - Porsche Carrera GT
7.56*C5 Z06TT (APS Turbo, no cats, stock muffler, 573 rwhp @ 9.5 psi) / 1 shift
7.73*997TT with ECU flash / 2 shifts
7.86*Corvette C6 Z06, stock, Divexxtreme / 2 shifts)
8.07*Lamborghini LP640 / 2 shifts
8.86*Stock 997TT / 32 degrees, Tiptronic (0 shifts)
9.10*993 Ruf R Turbo 490 HP / 2 shifts
9.4 - Lamborghini Diablo VT 6.0
9.5 - Ferrari F430
9.6 - Ferrari F50
10.06*996TT with ECU flash / 1 shift
10.9 - Lamborghini Murcielago

Sources:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...0-130-mph.html

all the cars slower are at this point dinosaurs

[mrgicm]

I was expecting for it to be faster. Rolling start it is no improvment to the f10.

[onfireX5]

Originally Posted by mrgicm

I was expecting for it to be faster. Rolling start it is no improvment to the f10.

Stock F10 runs an 8.30 ?

[Mrgunfun]

Originally Posted by MTHX

For the sake of comparison, here are some 60-130 times for other fast street and production vehicles:

NOTE: Only the below runs with an asterisk (*) next to them have been verified. The accuracy of the other runs can not be guaranteed.

3.9*900+ rwhp Supra, 88mm turbo, 30 psi, TH400 Auto, ET Drags
4.74*996TT 890 rwhp, Divexxtreme 2-shifts
4.9 - 940 rwhp Supra (35 psi)
5.1 - 840 rwhp Supra (30 psi)
5.4 - 1,000 rwhp TT Viper
5.6 - Bugatti Veyron (estimate based off of verified 100 - 200kph time of 4.8)
5.9 - GSXR 1000 with bolt-ons
5.98*C5 Vette with big motor and NOS
6.1 - Saleen S7 Twin Turbo
6.69*Dr. Jitsu / 996 GT2 / 700 crank HP / 1-shift
6.9 - Mosler MT900S
7.0 - Ferrari Enzo
7.24 - Mercedes SLR McLaren
7.3 - Porsche Carrera GT
7.56*C5 Z06TT (APS Turbo, no cats, stock muffler, 573 rwhp @ 9.5 psi) / 1 shift
7.73*997TT with ECU flash / 2 shifts
7.86*Corvette C6 Z06, stock, Divexxtreme / 2 shifts)
8.07*Lamborghini LP640 / 2 shifts
8.86*Stock 997TT / 32 degrees, Tiptronic (0 shifts)
9.10*993 Ruf R Turbo 490 HP / 2 shifts
9.4 - Lamborghini Diablo VT 6.0
9.5 - Ferrari F430
9.6 - Ferrari F50
10.06*996TT with ECU flash / 1 shift
10.9 - Lamborghini Murcielago

Sources:
https://mbworld.org/forums/w211-amg/...0-130-mph.html

They are all 10+ years old cars..

[Brake_Late]

Originally Posted by uniqueMR

Beautiful car,

@DINMANN boom

[MTHX]

Originally Posted by Mrgunfun

They are all 10+ years old cars..

i know .. i know, but it was only to give you a basic idea of ​​comparison. I did not have time (sorry I work) to gather a block of information with updated data on what is done today in terms of car's performance for the 60-130 mph. But it can still give a good indication anyway

[werdn]

Originally Posted by Lalit@autocouture

Wrapped in satin black by NDvinyls/180 NYC. More pics coming up and car will be getting catless downpipes installed shortly. Here's our stock baseline for now


Fifth gear:
568rwhp/536rwtq
569rwhp/537rwtq

Wow, the numbers are a lot more better than the first M5 dyno post!

[Remonster]

Originally Posted by Mrgunfun

They are all 10+ years old cars..

That's also an almost 10 year old thread.

[PARTS@STBMW]

This M5 just blew all the other F90s out of the water.

[vtknight]

Originally Posted by Remonster

That's also an almost 10 year old thread.

Yes. The point was to provide a comparison, please feel free to add your own list.

I am surprised the 60-130 is quicker in RWD. And I am wondering about the 60-130 times. It's a 127-129 MPH trapping car.

Also the 1:1 gear for the F90 is 6th - which was 587 WHP - even at 10% drive train loss (some say the newer cars are more efficient) - that is still 652 HP. 690 at 15%.

[vtknight]

Originally Posted by Lalit@autocouture

Sixth gear is 1:1 and made 587rwhp/568rwtq but hits the speed limiter.

Fifth gear:
568rwhp/536rwtq
569rwhp/537rwtq

8.30 seconds RWD 60-130
8.57 seconds AWD 60-130

Thanks for the information, especially which gear is 1:1.
Question on the 60-130:

0-60 is at least 3.2, go through the 1/4 and it is at least 11.1 to 11.2 - at 127-129 MPH according to the magazines.

Did you get your times from a dig/low MPH start - or at 60 MPH and then hit it? Or was this gained via the dyno run? I would submit that if it was a part of the dyno run, that the 60-130 MPH runs will be significantly quicker on the street. With a 127-129 MPH trap - my guess is at least in the high 7's.

[Madvillain]

hefty numbers id drive it in rwd 90% of the time. would only switch to awd when i have a traffic light or stop sign.

[fusionchicken]

Originally Posted by vtknight

Thanks for the information, especially which gear is 1:1.
Question on the 60-130:

0-60 is at least 3.2, go through the 1/4 and it is at least 11.1 to 11.2 - at 127-129 MPH according to the magazines.

Did you get your times from a dig/low MPH start - or at 60 MPH and then hit it? Or was this gained via the dyno run? I would submit that if it was a part of the dyno run, that the 60-130 MPH runs will be significantly quicker on the street. With a 127-129 MPH trap - my guess is at least in the high 7's.

Agreed not taking anything away from the OP as I am grateful for members who further the education of vehicles

But I did expect a quicker 60-130 time based on the car's trap speed. It's not slow by any means (it's a four door luxury sedan for crying out loud let's put things into perspective here)

Off topic: the list above showing a C6 Z06 with a 7.8 60-130mph time is pretty insane, my best stock C6Z is 8.2 guess I don't have the driver mod lol

I fully expect to get walked by a stock F90 M5 on the freeway in a stock C6Z, from a dig the AWD M5 will be multiple zip codes ahead by the time I hit 100mph on street surface. Just wondering how the 7.8x C6Z 60-130 time above was measured and how that compares to the 60-130mph time for the F90 M5 here, probably will never know

[Lalit@autocouture]

Originally Posted by shahin

Please post link or info of where you buying the catless down pipes from. Thank you

They're made by Lusso Performance. In stock and ready to go. Shoot me an email: Lalit@autocouturemotoring.com for pricing

Originally Posted by elitex

Correct me if I am wrong but that 60-130 time is very impressive.

Also, why not run AWD dyno also?

Will run it on a linked AWD dyno soon

Originally Posted by mrgicm

I was expecting for it to be faster. Rolling start it is no improvment to the f10.

Incorrect. The F90 is considerably quicker...

Originally Posted by vtknight

Yes. The point was to provide a comparison, please feel free to add your own list.

I am surprised the 60-130 is quicker in RWD. And I am wondering about the 60-130 times. It's a 127-129 MPH trapping car.

Also the 1:1 gear for the F90 is 6th - which was 587 WHP - even at 10% drive train loss (some say the newer cars are more efficient) - that is still 652 HP. 690 at 15%.

Traction isn't an issue at stock power levels so naturally one can expect it to be faster in RWD due to less drivetrain loss. The 60-130 times shown are right in line for 127-129mph traps.

Originally Posted by vtknight

Thanks for the information, especially which gear is 1:1.
Question on the 60-130:

0-60 is at least 3.2, go through the 1/4 and it is at least 11.1 to 11.2 - at 127-129 MPH according to the magazines.

Did you get your times from a dig/low MPH start - or at 60 MPH and then hit it? Or was this gained via the dyno run? I would submit that if it was a part of the dyno run, that the 60-130 MPH runs will be significantly quicker on the street. With a 127-129 MPH trap - my guess is at least in the high 7's.

It's about finding the sweet spot between gearing and momentum. It's best to get going in fourth gear (to avoid a second shift) around 50mph and end at the top of fifth.

Originally Posted by fusionchicken

Agreed not taking anything away from the OP as I am grateful for members who further the education of vehicles

But I did expect a quicker 60-130 time based on the car's trap speed. It's not slow by any means (it's a four door luxury sedan for crying out loud let's put things into perspective here)

Off topic: the list above showing a C6 Z06 with a 7.8 60-130mph time is pretty insane, my best stock C6Z is 8.2 guess I don't have the driver mod lol

I fully expect to get walked by a stock F90 M5 on the freeway in a stock C6Z, from a dig the AWD M5 will be multiple zip codes ahead by the time I hit 100mph on street surface. Just wondering how the 7.8x C6Z 60-130 time above was measured and how that compares to the 60-130mph time for the F90 M5 here.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't a stock C6Z trap around 127mph? If you're running 60-130 in 8.2 seconds as well, isn't it impressive for a car that's 4,000+lbs to be just a tenth slower?

[Lalit@autocouture]

Original post edited with catless downpipe install and 100-200KPH numbers for my metric folk.

Sound clip coming shortly