BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts
BMW M5 F90 (2018+) General Forums Engine, Exhaust, Drivetrain, Tuning Modifications    Noelle Tune Before/After

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-27-2022, 02:45 PM   #23
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

I could not wait until tomorrows better weather to make a run. So, in the interest of transparency here is todays run. I am new to not only dragy, but what certain speeds and times can say about a run. I am hoping someone can help me understand this slip a little better. First, I understand that this 1/4 ET is about what it should run stock, and certainly not impressive for a tuned M5 competition. However, before I call Noelle and complain; my 0-60 times are worse than stock, but my trap speeds seem to suggest I should have much better ETs than I do. It has been a bit cool out, and the roads were not completely dry, but I cannot be sure if I had wheel spin. It seems to bog down at first, then engage a second later. Again, I don't want to jump the gun and start complaining to Noelle without maximizing my results and having genuine data to report. Any thoughts or interpretation help would be greatly appreciated.

Name:  PNG image.jpg
Views: 373
Size:  80.8 KB
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2022, 03:57 PM   #24
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

I guess I should have mentioned that I am not using LC. I haven't even had the car long enough to figure out how it works.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2022, 08:16 PM   #25
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5227
Rep
10,610
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

That is about 3 mph trap speed better than any stock car.
Appreciate 1
      09-27-2022, 08:23 PM   #26
ResIpsaLoquitur
Brigadier General
ResIpsaLoquitur's Avatar
No_Country
4089
Rep
3,670
Posts

Drives: 2022 M5C
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
That is about 3 mph trap speed better than any stock car.
Wow, I'd be furious for all that to result in that minimal gain!
__________________
Not a BMW guy...but certainly an M5 guy.
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2022, 08:35 PM   #27
UglyBuzzard
Colonel
UglyBuzzard's Avatar
United_States
6356
Rep
2,329
Posts

Drives: F90 / M5
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (0)

Don't answer if you are not comfortable but curious, what did this cost you?
Appreciate 0
      09-27-2022, 08:48 PM   #28
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5227
Rep
10,610
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ResIpsaLoquitur View Post
Wow, I'd be furious for all that to result in that minimal gain!
3mph better than the best any stock M5 would do. Some trap 125-126, some a little better. We have no before numbers from this car so we don’t know what the tune added. 3mph is the minimum.
Appreciate 1
      09-27-2022, 10:24 PM   #29
ResIpsaLoquitur
Brigadier General
ResIpsaLoquitur's Avatar
No_Country
4089
Rep
3,670
Posts

Drives: 2022 M5C
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResIpsaLoquitur View Post
Wow, I'd be furious for all that to result in that minimal gain!
3mph better than the best any stock M5 would do. Some trap 125-126, some a little better. We have no before numbers from this car so we don’t know what the tune added. 3mph is the minimum.
Thanks for the clarification!
__________________
Not a BMW guy...but certainly an M5 guy.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 06:14 AM   #30
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

3k. While I’m certainly upset about the ETs, I guess I’m still curious as to what I need to improve in my launch and take off to get a true idea of what the tune has done compared to average stock (since I don’t have pre tune runs). I may still be irritated after all of it, but clearly this run suggests something is off with my launch.

I guess a better way to say it is if my 0-60 time improves to just average stock, my ET looks more acceptable. Which my trap speed suggests I should be running, correct?

BTW, I appreciate the responses and help!!
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 06:28 AM   #31
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5227
Rep
10,610
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

ET is dependent on launch. You can work on that. There is a trans tune that some say helps, particularly if your car will no longer engage launch control (some say it is limited to 100 engagements).
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 08:02 AM   #32
onfireX5
Brigadier General
3618
Rep
4,532
Posts

Drives: F90M5,F85X5M
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Va

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bolrmakr73 View Post
3k. While I’m certainly upset about the ETs, I guess I’m still curious as to what I need to improve in my launch and take off to get a true idea of what the tune has done compared to average stock (since I don’t have pre tune runs). I may still be irritated after all of it, but clearly this run suggests something is off with my launch.

I guess a better way to say it is if my 0-60 time improves to just average stock, my ET looks more acceptable. Which my trap speed suggests I should be running, correct?

BTW, I appreciate the responses and help!!
To eliminate the launch from the equation, pull the 60 to 130 mph metric from that 1/4 mile pass from Dragy and post it. That will be another indicator of power.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 10:39 AM   #33
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by onfireX5 View Post
To eliminate the launch from the equation, pull the 60 to 130 mph metric from that 1/4 mile pass from Dragy and post it. That will be another indicator of power.

Name:  IMG_7A03AB73DF03-1.jpg
Views: 311
Size:  74.9 KB
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 10:58 AM   #34
Sophisticated Redneck
Lieutenant Colonel
1414
Rep
1,564
Posts

Drives: 2012 BMW X5 50i
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

What fuel are you using? I would be curious to see what difference you would see with a 95-96aki rating. Do you have access to E85 or race gas you can mix in?
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 11:17 AM   #35
onfireX5
Brigadier General
3618
Rep
4,532
Posts

Drives: F90M5,F85X5M
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Va

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bolrmakr73 View Post
Not bad , actually.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 11:35 AM   #36
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5227
Rep
10,610
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

I agree. I think 7.34 60-130 is good for a stock M5 with just a tune and running 93 pump gas.
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 11:42 AM   #37
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

You have to forgive my ignorance, but I did not know we could mix in E85 safely without a specific tune for it. My knowledge is not exactly vast on the subject (lol). I am using 93 from my local stations. I was told from my Trackhawk tuner that in my area, once October hits, the winter blend of ethanol is crap. There is a Sunoco about 15 miles away that has race gas I could try. While I definitely want my times better, my ultimate goal is to see what this tune did (or did not do) compared to stock since I do not have pre-tune dragy runs. I've tried launching every way I can imagine (except for using LC, which is next this afternoon), and I just spin. Just some background info, I bought the car (2019 M5 comp) 6 weeks ago with 2600 miles (not a typo). So while the tires only have 4k miles now, they are quite a bit old. I know this is not helping my launch. Should my 60-130 time be better than that? I thought stock was in the 8.2 neighborhood?

Again, I appreciate the help!!
Appreciate 0
      09-28-2022, 11:43 AM   #38
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
I agree. I think 7.34 60-130 is good for a stock M5 with just a tune and running 93 pump gas.

I appreciate the response. I certainly do not believe the wild 850HP claims from Noelle, but I'm trying to determine if it did anything at all after reading some earlier threads from here on Noelle.
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2022, 02:00 PM   #39
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

Finally sunny out.....

Name:  IMG_4364.jpg
Views: 273
Size:  74.3 KB
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2022, 04:20 PM   #40
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5227
Rep
10,610
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

You are getting faster! Time for some more mods to get into the 6s.
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2022, 05:17 PM   #41
Sophisticated Redneck
Lieutenant Colonel
1414
Rep
1,564
Posts

Drives: 2012 BMW X5 50i
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bolrmakr73 View Post
You have to forgive my ignorance, but I did not know we could mix in E85 safely without a specific tune for it. My knowledge is not exactly vast on the subject (lol). I am using 93 from my local stations. I was told from my Trackhawk tuner that in my area, once October hits, the winter blend of ethanol is crap. There is a Sunoco about 15 miles away that has race gas I could try. While I definitely want my times better, my ultimate goal is to see what this tune did (or did not do) compared to stock since I do not have pre-tune dragy runs. I've tried launching every way I can imagine (except for using LC, which is next this afternoon), and I just spin. Just some background info, I bought the car (2019 M5 comp) 6 weeks ago with 2600 miles (not a typo). So while the tires only have 4k miles now, they are quite a bit old. I know this is not helping my launch. Should my 60-130 time be better than that? I thought stock was in the 8.2 neighborhood?

Again, I appreciate the help!!

Not a problem happy to help and yes mixing in E85 is no problem on any modern BMW platform, even on my 10 year old E70 I mix in 5-6 gallons per 20 gallon fillup for an effective 94-95aki rating.

How much E85 you can mix in without triggering an check engine light is the question and this is different for each platform. Once you max out your fuel trims, you will start to run lean and the DME will trigger a check engine light with codes usually indicating an issue with mixture control. You have to start off on the lower end and watch your fuel trims, air/fuel ratio and go from there.

However you indicated you have access to race gas so I would just toss in a 50/50 mix of 100 unleaded race gas and 91gas for an effective 95-96aki rating and see if your times improve. If it does improve, you can add in more race gas and see if there is any more improvement and find the sweet spot for your tune/engine. Even if your times don't improve, I would still recommend tossing in a few gallons of race or good E85 with each fill-up. It adds buffer to protect against knock/super knock on tuned engines. IMHO all tuned engines should be running at least 93+aki,
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2022, 07:37 PM   #42
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophisticated Redneck View Post
Not a problem happy to help and yes mixing in E85 is no problem on any modern BMW platform, even on my 10 year old E70 I mix in 5-6 gallons per 20 gallon fillup for an effective 94-95aki rating.

How much E85 you can mix in without triggering an check engine light is the question and this is different for each platform. Once you max out your fuel trims, you will start to run lean and the DME will trigger a check engine light with codes usually indicating an issue with mixture control. You have to start off on the lower end and watch your fuel trims, air/fuel ratio and go from there.

However you indicated you have access to race gas so I would just toss in a 50/50 mix of 100 unleaded race gas and 91gas for an effective 95-96aki rating and see if your times improve. If it does improve, you can add in more race gas and see if there is any more improvement and find the sweet spot for your tune/engine. Even if your times don't improve, I would still recommend tossing in a few gallons of race or good E85 with each fill-up. It adds buffer to protect against knock/super knock on tuned engines. IMHO all tuned engines should be running at least 93+aki,
Thanks for all the info. I will start trying that tomorrow.
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2022, 07:38 PM   #43
bolrmakr73
New Member
3
Rep
15
Posts

Drives: 2019 M5 Competition
Join Date: Sep 2022
Location: Grand Blanc, Michigan

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbonsalb View Post
You are getting faster! Time for some more mods to get into the 6s.

It's like an itch you can never quite fully scratch......
Appreciate 0
      09-29-2022, 08:09 PM   #44
ResIpsaLoquitur
Brigadier General
ResIpsaLoquitur's Avatar
No_Country
4089
Rep
3,670
Posts

Drives: 2022 M5C
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Earth

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophisticated Redneck View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolrmakr73 View Post
You have to forgive my ignorance, but I did not know we could mix in E85 safely without a specific tune for it. My knowledge is not exactly vast on the subject (lol). I am using 93 from my local stations. I was told from my Trackhawk tuner that in my area, once October hits, the winter blend of ethanol is crap. There is a Sunoco about 15 miles away that has race gas I could try. While I definitely want my times better, my ultimate goal is to see what this tune did (or did not do) compared to stock since I do not have pre-tune dragy runs. I've tried launching every way I can imagine (except for using LC, which is next this afternoon), and I just spin. Just some background info, I bought the car (2019 M5 comp) 6 weeks ago with 2600 miles (not a typo). So while the tires only have 4k miles now, they are quite a bit old. I know this is not helping my launch. Should my 60-130 time be better than that? I thought stock was in the 8.2 neighborhood?

Again, I appreciate the help!!

Not a problem happy to help and yes mixing in E85 is no problem on any modern BMW platform, even on my 10 year old E70 I mix in 5-6 gallons per 20 gallon fillup for an effective 94-95aki rating.

How much E85 you can mix in without triggering an check engine light is the question and this is different for each platform. Once you max out your fuel trims, you will start to run lean and the DME will trigger a check engine light with codes usually indicating an issue with mixture control. You have to start off on the lower end and watch your fuel trims, air/fuel ratio and go from there.

However you indicated you have access to race gas so I would just toss in a 50/50 mix of 100 unleaded race gas and 91gas for an effective 95-96aki rating and see if your times improve. If it does improve, you can add in more race gas and see if there is any more improvement and find the sweet spot for your tune/engine. Even if your times don't improve, I would still recommend tossing in a few gallons of race or good E85 with each fill-up. It adds buffer to protect against knock/super knock on tuned engines. IMHO all tuned engines should be running at least 93+aki,
Always learn something from you. Thank you!
__________________
Not a BMW guy...but certainly an M5 guy.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 AM.




m5post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST