|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Water to air intercooler feasability
|
|
09-30-2015, 07:47 AM | #1 |
First Lieutenant
74
Rep 315
Posts
Drives: 2008 Deep Green 335xi 6MT
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Falling Waters, WV
|
Water to air intercooler feasability
Well now that the systems are becoming cheaper and cheaper.. alas
http://www.frozenboost(remove).com/l...r-intercooler/ The sky is the limit with configurations. Many benefits - higher ceiling for heatsoak, shorter piping = less lag, lower pressure drop through intercooler, higher efficiency.. etc My question is do we have the room to do it?
__________________
|
09-30-2015, 08:59 AM | #2 |
Major
148
Rep 1,201
Posts |
Don't do it unless it's for a pure drag car and you'll be using an icebox or using a killer chiller. Streetability-wise, it can't touch an air/air.
Nearly all M3 s/c kits have air/water. The ones that perform more consistently are the air/air. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2015, 09:49 AM | #3 |
Private First Class
15
Rep 137
Posts |
I am also interested in attempting this project at some point, though real life has me otherwise occupied at the moment. My plan was to go into this as an experiment and be willing to scrap the whole thing and go back to air/air if it could not be set up to work well.
what I had in mind was to get inlets that move the intakes to the passenger side, route the turbine outlets over the top of the engine and merge them into the intercooler which would be sitting just on top of the intake manifold. It would be a great deal of work, but I think it would be interesting to see the results. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2015, 10:28 PM | #4 |
Second Lieutenant
92
Rep 223
Posts |
I have done this on a previous car build of mine on a big turbo SAAB, it was a complete headache. Too many things to go wrong and hard to monitor if everything was working correctly. Ended up swapping back to an air to air.
I will add that it did perform exceptionally well when it was working correctly. For drag and auto-x I would put ice in my water reservoir and my oat would drop to levels similar to a nice cool fall morning, it was a lot of fun but not worth the reliability issues on a daily in my opinion |
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2015, 09:39 AM | #6 | |
Banned
2134
Rep 3,553
Posts |
Quote:
Air to Water for a daily driver street car isnt practical. More of a headache than its worth. just get a meth kit if you want to drop IATs more than ambient. If its a dedicated track car, then yeah, it is better and would be worth it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2015, 03:06 PM | #7 |
Captain
135
Rep 691
Posts |
Really 2 main reasons to go Air/Water (vs. Air/Air):
So unless you're #1, even the WR Power N54's haven't exceeded the cooling capability of an Air/Air system. Also, prob LOTS of headaches--plumbing, additional power demand for pumps, CAN integration, etc.
__________________
Results > |
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2015, 07:26 PM | #9 |
First Lieutenant
74
Rep 315
Posts
Drives: 2008 Deep Green 335xi 6MT
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Falling Waters, WV
|
external cooling will always be a much safer option. Hydrolocking an engine from a failing nozzle isn't worth the risk imo.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2015, 08:21 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant Colonel
388
Rep 1,946
Posts |
That's why I said some. Everyone has there own thoughts about it
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|