Quote:
Originally Posted by Bfpd
Understand the skepticism on the Internet these days. You guys can check out my Instagram at @bdussert. It's all out there (including best ever stock times and a video of my first 2.53 0-60). To clarify, I heard about Noelle initially on YouTube, talked to the guys there and at Lonestar Bavarians, then read all the threads and was discouraged by the lack of data and large number of naysayers. Figured it was worth a go to see what it could do. And I freaking love it so far. It was $3,600 plus an oil change with LiquiMolly. The Noelle warranty says don't do dyno runs due to cooling issues in many dyno setups. They will let you if you prove to them your setup has sufficient air handling. I don't need to dyno it when I just ran a 10.24 ET at 135! Best 60-130 is 6.94 sec. Best ever 60-130 stock was 7.99 sec, with typical being 8.1X. This is far from the only answer, but it's a pretty cool option. And yes, I have a GT2RS and a GT3RS, but still hesitated for weeks before pulling the trigger, because why torch money for no reason?
|
Like you said, there are way too many skeptical things going with Noelle Tune, some were claiming outrageous numbers and you proved them otherwise posting your times. I mean i'll be honest, for the price you paid for the tune it is not worth it compared to Bootmod3.
Bootmod3 offers same performance, 1/3 cheaper, tested on many more cars so we know its reliable and the biggest thing is their platform that allows you to adjust few things. I'm just not sure why risk paying 3 times more for a tune you know very little of? I mean i would understand going that route if their performance was better but that isn't the case based on the numbers you provided. I don't want to brag but HCP tune for example (Through BM3 Platform) puts down very good numbers, I have their tune together with few other members. 60-130= 5.9s, 1/4 = 9.9s.
Even DME is similarly price ranged as Noelle but again puts down better numbers and has been around.