Hahahah i read the whole thing but did not understand, too much data hahaha. But I don't think he should compare two cars in two different tracks. F30 is fun, I have just ordered JRZ RS PRO, and BF goodrich r1s tires. want to show some f30 proud.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoDiezl350
Wait you're comparing your times at Thunderhill with times at Sears? Since you have experience with both cars you may be in a position to provide a qualitative assessment, but I wouldn't rely on comparing 2 different cars on 2 different tracks based on an expected lap time difference.
For instance the fastest time I could find for Thunderhill was around 1:48 while the fastest for Sears was 1.39. So yes at the highest levels there appears to be a 10 second difference, but then if I look at the 20th fastest time, it's 2:07 for Thunderhill while it's 1:50 for Sears.
The fact that the 20th fastest time for Thunderhill is 20 seconds slower than the fastest, while the 20th fastest time for Sears is only 11 seconds slower, suggest Thunderhill is in general a lot less consistent than Sears.
Maybe a better way to look at this is to consider that in your F30 you ran only 7 seconds slower than the 20th fastest @ Thunderhill while in the E36 you were 10 seconds slower than the 20th fastest Sears time.
http://www.trackhq.com/forums/f99/to...ap-times-2421/
http://www.trackhq.com/forums/f93/to...ap-times-2417/ |