View Single Post
      05-10-2014, 03:28 PM   #12
Needsdecaf
Major General
Needsdecaf's Avatar
6774
Rep
6,764
Posts

Drives: 2024 G80 Comp xDrive
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The Woodlands, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KKM3 View Post
I just posted the same question in another thread

For those of you who defend bmw by saying they were forced to turbocharge the new m3 to meet eu standard for mpg and emissions, I say to you this.

Why couldn't they use a supercharger ala the 3.0 tfsi engine in the Audi s4 instead of a turbocharger? A supercharger will feel naturally aspirated, deliver a linear powerband, will not muffle/mute the sound and still achieve good mpg.

My opinion is that Bmw is fucking cheap and wants to use the same engine in every freaking car they have available. Cost cutting and profits, that's really what it comes down to.

I have a 2013 s4 used as my DD and with a simple tune and pulley I'm putting close to 400awhp while achieving 20mpg city and 31mpg highway and my car weighs 4000 pounds. Imagine a similar setup in the m3 only with a higher redline. Check out my apr stage 2 s4
]
Your argument is nonsensical. BMW is cheap using the same engine in every car? Give me a break. The S55 is very loosely based on the N55. Wheras, let's see, where do we use that ubiquitous Audi 3.0T engine? More like, where DON'T they?

S4
Q5 3.0T
SQ5 (slightly modified)
A6 3.0T
A7 3.0T
A8 3.0T
Q7 3.0T

In otherwords....in every vehicle other than the R8 and the A3 lies the nefarious 3.0T. Still think it's BMW who's cheap?

And oh yeah, let's see how long that engine lasts in the next 3-5 years. Say bye bye.

Not saying that the engine isn't good. But it's not the future.
Appreciate 0