View Single Post
      12-09-2018, 01:11 PM   #35
gmd2003
Colonel
gmd2003's Avatar
352
Rep
2,176
Posts

Drives: 2014 CP M6 and 2006 VT 525 Z4M
Join Date: May 2012
Location: South Carolina

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by onfireX5 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by gmd2003 View Post
A stock 99.12 Turbo S does 0-60 in 2.5 , 0–100 mph in 6 flat , and 10.5@ 132 mph VBOX , zero slope . Most tuned M5's can't touch that . Tuned it's total destruction . With just exhaust my .2 Turbo S was running 10.2 @133 mph and , 7.3 60-130 mph 160 mph 1/2 mile on 93 octane zero slope .
Ps lots of BS in previous fan boy post lol .
That all sounds great. But same day same track no Vbox results do not show that delta. I’ve personally seen a .15 and 2 mph. Vtknight posted the time slips of his Comp and a 991.2. Same track, same day. No Vbox. Hard to dispute that.
Big difference between a Turbo and a Turbo S , most people can't tell the difference lol . Also driver mod is important , if you don't use LC it's much slower just like the M5 . Stock vs stock my point is it's not even close in a straight line and on track it's a massacre , can't hide 900 pounds . I much prefer a V8 or a V10 this ive sold mine , but nothing launches like a Turbo S on street tires . 1.5 60 ft all day long . From a roll vs a tuned S63 Tu eclipsed M yes they are very close , my full exhaust 93 octane tuned M6 ran identical 7.3-7.5 60-130 in the same DA and location but was not as consistent in hot weather. But on a certified drag strip an exhaust only .2 Turbo S ran a 10.29 @132 mph on pump. I've yet to see a stock F90 come close to that combo . You can mod anything to be faster than anything of course .
Appreciate 0