View Single Post
      12-29-2018, 05:39 PM   #10
MV99
New Member
38
Rep
26
Posts

Drives: 2018 E63 , 2018 M5, 2019 B7
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Bay Area, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by onfireX5 View Post
RC uses the Quartz box and it must measure something differently in the 100-200kph tests. (or test on a slope) My best on level 7 is 6.69 I did pick up the performance gain they claim at a 0.60 reduction from stock. I went from a 7.29 stock to 6.69 = 0.60 reduction. RC went from 6.88 to 6.22 = 0.66 reduction. That's pretty close....but the overall numbers are wonky. Glad you posted yours...thought I was a one off. 10 second, 4 doors sedans are uber cool !
With following facts, it should be safe to say our measurements are relatively consistent:

** your 100-200 is 6.69 (map 7 and assumed 93 fuel) and mine is 6.90 (map 6 and 91 fuel).

** I had one 7.55 record with stock form. The improvement was 0.65 second compared to theirs (0.65) and yours (0.60).

** I actually verified with stopwatch and their 6.88 and 6.22 were surprisingly accurate and if 6.88 in stock form is correct, it means they had a stock f90 could achieve 10.75 for quarter mile which indicates the test section must be slightly downhill...........or, f90 runs little faster at home.........
Appreciate 1
soooma1377.50