Quote:
Originally Posted by Z K
I like Rolex but they haven't advanced in terms of their movements in a very long time. Even their own Tudor has a newer, more advanced in house movement. I think too many people buy into the Rolex hype and care about appearance over anything technical.
|
Sorry, this is where I respectfully disagree with you .Rolex sets its own standard in its own movements ruling out commonplace COSC standards as they introduced +2/-2 accuracy a few years ago besides newer movements come with 70-72 hours power reserve as opposed to 48 hours such as GMT MASTER II,DATE JUST .I am not even talking about revolutionary SKY DWELLER movements
However, I would like to see some freshness in Daytona cases as I think they're too small by today's chronographs .In this respect, 2-3 mm increase in size wouldn't hurt anybody but stoic purists