Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlosM4
The CarWow test got a lot of hate, because it showed the E63 S outperforming the M5 on the strip. To my eyes the test was pretty fair. The performance results so far have been pretty equal (the M5 F90 pulls harder initially on some tests, on others it is tied, and the E 63 S pulls harder at top end). The braking test was a little weird, although nothing to be surprised. Then later on this very thread which the E63 S beat the M5 F90 by 0.1s (ridiculous difference by the way), people saying Sutcliffe can't drive (LOL). Then there is the ridiculous discussion about the tyres and their effect. Who cares?
I am not saying you are one of the members who come here to the forum mainly to cause silly arguments, but there is a lot of members here who come with the sole purpose of dare I say it, shitposting.
I will comment again, I think both these cars are amazing. I haven't driven the M5 F90 (and I will reserve my judgement on both cars' performance abilities until I drive the M5 on track and street, as I have driven the E63 S on track and on the streets), but I have driven the E63 S. It is an outstanding piece of kit. Therefore there is no need for all this hate on both directions (morons who come to criticize the M5 F90, claiming the E63 S is better, and morons who do the opposite). Both are the best supersaloons money can buy, and that is the end.
|
thanks Carlos. I hope there is no chicken wire on the fence